首页
登录
职称英语
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has cr
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has cr
游客
2024-09-10
29
管理
问题
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has crashed, from 5. 1 babies per woman in 1964 to 2. 5 today. The average Bangladeshi woman can now expect to have about the same number of children as the average French woman. Only in sub-Saharan Africa are big families still in vogue, and even there they are shrinking. This is welcome. It suggests that women have gained more control over their bodies and that parents no longer reproduce frantically for fear that some of their children will die. Cutting the birth rate also leaves countries with fewer dependants per worker, at least for a time, making them better off.
(2) But this triumph conceals a growing problem. For more and more couples, the greatest source of anguish is that they have fewer children than they want, or none at all. With GlobeScan, a consultancy, The Economist polled 19 countries, asking people how many children they would like and how many they expect to have. In every rich country we surveyed, couples expect to be less fertile than they would like, and many in developing countries suffer the same sorrow. On average, Greeks think the ideal family contains 2.6 children but believe they will end up with 1.7.
(3) Medical infertility is part of the problem, not just in rich countries, where couples put off having children until it is rather late, but also in poor countries, where health care is worse. By one global estimate, at least 48m couples have been trying for a child for the past five years but have not succeeded, up from 42m in 1990. But the main reason for the shortfall, according to our poll, is money. From Brooklyn to Beijing, the cost of housing and education is so high that many young people say they cannot afford as many children as they want.
(4) Malthusians (马尔萨斯人口控制论者) will rejoice. The population is growing fast enough already, they will argue. Besides, can’t infertile couples just adopt children? In fact, population growth today largely reflects longer lives and will eventually go into reverse. It is not clear that there are too many people; and it is callous to ask couples who might want children to forgo that joy simply because some of their neighbours would prefer a less populous planet. And adoption, though admirable, is neither the sole responsibility of the childless nor a perfect substitute for procreation.
(5) The pain of having no or fewer children than you desire is often extreme. It can cause depression and in poor countries can be a social catastrophe. Couples impoverish themselves pursuing ineffective treatments; wornen who are thought to be barren are divorced, ostracised or worse. Last month a childless Kenyan tailor was charged with attempted murder, having allegedly attacked his wife with a machete.
(6) In wealthy countries, where maternity wards are quiet partly because the young are so economically insecure, governments can help by doing things they should be doing anyway: liberalising labour markets that shut the young out of jobs, relaxing planning rules to make housing cheaper and promoting child-friendly policies in the workplace. Across the world, education is important, both to warn women about how fertility declines with age and, especially in Africa, about preventable infections such as chlamydia and gonorrhoea.
(7) Most important, however, is medical innovation. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) (试管婴儿) has become better over the years but is still horribly expensive. Some couples remortgage their homes in the hope of conceiving. Research into more frugal technology is staggeringly rare, given the demand for it. Would lower, cheaper doses of ivf drugs work as well for some people? No one knows. Will a shoe-box-sized IVF laboratory developed in America work reliably? Trials are only now under way.
(8) More money for research would help, as it generally does. But perhaps not as much as more attention. Governments and aid agencies have turned family planning into a wholly one-sided campaign, dedicated to minimising teenage pregnancies and unwanted births; it has come to mean family restriction. Instead, family planning ought to mean helping people to have as many, or as few, children as they want. [br] Which of the following is the most appropriate title for the passage?
选项
A、Family Planning as Wanted.
B、Cutting the Birth Rate.
C、Teenage Pregnancies.
D、Medical Innovation.
答案
A
解析
主旨题。纵览全文,文章围绕family planning展开,最后一段更是明确指出family planning应该是让各个家庭都能够没有后顾之忧地养育下一代,故[A]为答案。[B]、[C]和[D]分别是在第一段、第八段和第七段提及的具体内容,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3751609.html
相关试题推荐
[audioFiles]2017m2x/audio_ezfj_001_201702[/audioFiles]TheModernFamily
Embracingglobalisation,Shanghaihasbecomeoneofthemost_______citiesinth
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
YardSalesYardsales【T1】______.Onefamily,【T2】______,canholdayard
YardSalesYardsales【T1】______.Onefamily,【T2】______,canholdayard
随机试题
ExercisingtoMusicPumpsupBrainPowerIfmusicmakesyousmarter,andexer
Writeanessayofnolessthan160wordsontheanswersheetinwhichyoudiscus
WhatisAnthonyHorowitzfamousfor?[br][originaltext]ThecharacterofSherlo
关于建筑物沉降缝的叙述,以下哪一条有误?()A.房屋从基础到屋顶的全部构件都
总承包单位土木工程、线路管道、设备安装工程按照工程合同价配备,()配备项目专职
用已知A型血与待测者血做交叉配血,若主反应凝集,次反应不凝集,待测者血型可能为A
下列情形中,不会引起短期现金需求的是( )。A.短期的存货周转率下降 B.短
慢性荨麻疹不宜使用A.维生素C B.皮质类固醇激素 C.抗组胺药 D.胎盘
长期应用某种药物后所造成的一种强迫要求连续或定期使用该药的行为或其他反应,称为A
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》(GB50854-2013),关于实心砖
最新回复
(
0
)