首页
登录
职称英语
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has c
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has c
游客
2024-09-09
3
管理
问题
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has crashed, from 5.1 babies per woman in 1964 to 2.5 today. The average Bangladeshi woman can now expect to have about the same number of children as the average French woman. Only in sub-Saharan Africa are big families still in vogue, and even there they are shrinking. This is welcome. It suggests that women have gained more control over their bodies and that parents no longer reproduce frantically for fear that some of their children will die. Cutting the birth rate also leaves countries with fewer dependants per worker, at least for a time, making them better off.
(2) But this triumph conceals a growing problem. For more and more couples, the greatest source of anguish is that they have fewer children than they want, or none at all. With GlobeScan, a consultancy, The Economist polled 19 countries, asking people how many children they would like and how many they expect to have. In every rich country we surveyed, couples expect to be less fertile than they would like, and many in developing countries suffer the same sorrow. On average, Greeks think the ideal family contains 2.6 children but believe they will end up with 1.7.
(3) Medical infertility is part of the problem, not just in rich countries, where couples put off having children until it is rather late, but also in poor countries, where health care is worse. By one global estimate, at least 48m couples have been trying for a child for the past five years but have not succeeded, up from 42m in 1990. But the main reason for the shortfall, according to our poll, is money. From Brooklyn to Beijing, the cost of housing and education is so high that many young people say they cannot afford as many children as they want.
(4) Malthusians (马尔萨斯人口控制论者) will rejoice. The population is growing fast enough already, they will argue. Besides, can’t infertile couples just adopt children? In fact, population growth today largely reflects longer lives and will eventually go into reverse. It is not clear that there are too many people; and it is callous to ask couples who might want children to forgo that joy simply because some of their neighbours would prefer a less populous planet. And adoption, though admirable, is neither the sole responsibility of the childless nor a perfect substitute for procreation.
(5) The pain of having no or fewer children than you desire is often extreme. It can cause depression and in poor countries can be a social catastrophe. Couples impoverish themselves pursuing ineffective treatments; women who are thought to be barren are divorced, ostracised or worse. Last month a childless Kenyan tailor was charged with attempted murder, having allegedly attacked his wife with a machete.
(6) In wealthy countries, where maternity wards are quiet partly because the young are so economically insecure, governments can help by doing things they should be doing anyway: liberalising labour markets that shut the young out of jobs, relaxing planning rules to make housing cheaper and promoting child-friendly policies in the workplace. Across the world, education is important, both to warn women about how fertility declines with age and, especially in Africa, about preventable infections such as chlamydia and gonorrhoea.
(7) Most important, however, is medical innovation. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) (试管婴儿) has become better over the years but is still horribly expensive. Some couples remortgage their homes in the hope of conceiving. Research into more frugal technology is staggeringly rare, given the demand for it. Would lower, cheaper doses of IVF drugs work as well for some people? No one knows. Will a shoe-box-sized IVF laboratory developed in America work reliably? Trials are only now under way.
(8) More money for research would help, as it generally does. But perhaps not as much as more attention. Governments and aid agencies have turned family planning into a wholly one-sided campaign, dedicated to minimising teenage pregnancies and unwanted births; it has come to mean family restriction. Instead, family planning ought to mean helping people to have as many, or as few, children as they want. [br] Global birth rate shrinking indicates all the following facts EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、women have gained more self-control
B、people have faith in their children’s survival
C、there will be less dependant-burden per worker
D、big families only exist in sub-Saharan Africa
答案
D
解析
原文第一段介绍了出生率下降的各种表现,A项、B项和C项均在文中提及,属于出生率下降,人口数量减少这一事实能够表明的问题,只有D项是对文中关于撒哈拉地区内容的曲解。本题是反选题,故排除A项、B项和C项,选择D项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3751142.html
相关试题推荐
PASSAGEFOUR[br]WhatdochildrenregardtheirparentsasinAmericanfamily?Go
PASSAGETWOGlobalwarming.根据题干中的manypeople和theultimatecauseofthissummer’s
[audioFiles]2017m2x/audio_ezfj_001_201702[/audioFiles]TheModernFamily
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
HospitalityAnAmericanfriendhas【T1】______youtovisithisfamily.But
YardSalesYardsales【T1】______.Onefamily,【T2】______,canholdayard
随机试题
ShouldYouLearnThai?HereareeightfeaturesaboutThailanguagetohelpstude
信令网按结构分为无级信令网和分级信令网。()
影响X线照片对比度的最主要因素是()A.毫安值 B.曝光时间 C.千伏值
建设用地费属于( )。A.建筑安装工程费用 B.企业管理费 C.工程建设其
贷款利息是货币所有者因暂时让渡一定货币资金使用权而从借款人那里取得的报酬。(
(2020年真题)两个或两个以上的当事人按共同商定的条件,在约定的时间内定期交换
A.打开阀门K后,由于受重力作用,水将从甲流到乙 B.打开阀门K后,由于b处的
某女,17岁,上前牙刷牙时牙龈易出血,经检查上前牙牙面较多菌斑堆积,唇侧牙龈肿胀
下列业务不发生消费税纳税义务的是()。A.汽车销售公司零售超豪华小汽车
用人单位经职工同意不安排年休假的,应当在本年度内对职工应休未休年休假天数,按照其
最新回复
(
0
)