(1) Reading award-winning literature may boost your ability to read other peo

游客2024-09-07  4

问题    (1) Reading award-winning literature may boost your ability to read other people, a new study suggests. Researchers at the New School for Social Research, in New York City, found that when they had volunteers read works of acclaimed "literary fiction" , it seemed to temporarily improve their ability to interpret other people’s emotions. The same was not true of nonfiction or "popular" fiction, the mystery, romance and science-fiction books that often dominate bestseller lists.
   (2) Experts said the findings, reported online in Science, suggest that literature might help people to be more perceptive and engaged in their lives.
   (3) "Reading literary fiction isn’t just for passing the time. It’s not just an escape," said Keith Oatiey, a professor emeritus of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto. "It also enables us to better understand others, and then take that into our daily lives. "
   (4) Oatiey was not involved in the new research, but worked on some of the first studies to suggest that reading literature can boost people’s empathy for others. His team has found that those who read a lot of fiction tend to show greater empathy on standard tests, but the same is not true of avid nonfiction fans.
   (5) But, the study by Oatiey and his team cannot prove that literature boosts empathy—empathetic folks may just be drawn to reading fiction, whereas the new study does offer some "cause-and-effect" evidence, Oatiey said. For the study, researchers set up a series of five experiments in which participants read either literary fiction, popular fiction, nonfiction or nothing at all before taking some standard tests. One of the tests is known as "Reading the Mind in the Eyes". People have to look at photos of actors’ eyes, and then guess what emotion is being expressed in each. The test is considered a measure of empathy. Overall, study participants fared better on the test after reading literary fiction, versus the other three conditions.
   (6) It was a small improvement, according to the principal researcher David Comer Kidd, "It’s not like taking people from a (grade) ’C’ to an ’A’ ," he said. But, Kidd added, the effect was seen after only about 10 minutes’ reading, and it was a statistically strong finding, meaning it’s unlikely to have been due to chance.
   (7) " Literary" fiction has no hard-and-fast definition. So Kidd and his colleagues chose contemporary works that have won or been finalists for outstanding literary awards. They included " The Round House" , by Louise Erdrich, " Salvage the Bones" , by Jesmyn Ward and the short story "Corrie" by Alice Munro. And "popular" fiction included best-sellers like "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn, and Danielle Steel’s "The Sins of the Mother".
   (8) What’s so special about literary fiction? "For one, it’s usually more focused on characters than on plot," Kidd noted. But beyond that, he said, there is usually no single "authoritative narrator" who takes us through the story. "It demands that the reader almost become a writer and fill in the gaps. You really have to think about the characters," Kidd said.
   (9) Oatley agreed. "Alice Munro doesn’t tell you what to think," he said. "You, yourself, have to make inferences about characters. And that’s often what we’re doing in our real-life conversations. " Or at least that’s what people could do.
   (10) Reading literary fiction could also offer a way to "practice" your social skills and use them more in real life, according to another researcher not involved in the study. "It’s like how pilots train in a flight simulator," said Raymond Mar, an associate professor of psychology at York University, in Toronto, who has collaborated with Oatley. "This is a great study," Mar said of the new study. But he added that the overall research in this area is " still in its infancy" and one key question is whether literary fiction really is better than other fiction.
   (11) Mar and his colleagues recently found that fans of romance novels tended to do best on tests of empathy. Unlike the current study, Mar’s study did not test people after having them read different types of fiction. So it’s possible that there is something else about romance-novel readers that makes them more understanding of others.
   (12) Still, according to Mar, it’s too early to tell people to trade in their Danielle Steel for Alice Munro, at least if the goal is boosting empathy.
   (13) It’s also possible that plays, movies or even TV shows could build your empathy muscles, according to Kidd. But reading may be special, he said, because it provides no visuals and you have to engage your imagination more.
   (14) Everyone agreed that the findings suggest literature is important beyond entertainment or improving vocabulary. "There’s a common belief that reading literature is frivolous, or not practical," Mar said. "But there’s a growing body of evidence that it’s important in skills that we need in our lives. " [br] Which of the following is NOT a special feature of literary fiction?

选项 A、More focus on character description.
B、Presence of an authoritative narrator.
C、Demand on readers’ ability to infer.
D、Presence of readers’ empathetic feelings.

答案 B

解析 细节题。根据题干定位至第八段。第八段以文学小说有什么特别之处这个问题开头,由此可知,该段接下来是在介绍文学小说的特色。该段第三句指出,通常并不存在一个“权威叙述者”带领我们看完整个故事。由此可知,文学小说中通常没有权威叙述者,选项B的表述与原文不符,故为答案。该段第二句提到文学小说通常更注重人物,而不是情节,选项A的表述与原文相符,因此排除A;该段第四句提到文学小说要求读者几乎变成作家并将情节补充完整,而第九段第三句对此具体解释道,读者自己必须对人物做出推断,也就是说,文学小说对读者的推断能力有要求,因此排除C;第一段第二句和第三句提到新研究发现志愿者阅读广受好评的“文学小说”作品时,似乎暂时提高了他们解读他人情绪的能力,而纪实作品或“通俗”小说并未产生这种效果,也就是说,读者存在同理心是文学小说的特色,故排除D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3747866.html
最新回复(0)