Recently, some local governments have advocated that university should teach

游客2024-09-02  11

问题     Recently, some local governments have advocated that university should teach at least one selective course in local dialect so as to protect the local language. Then a hot debate arises on this topic. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your view on the issue.
    Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
YES
Teaching courses in local dialect can highlight colorful tradition. We are now living in a world filled with a great variety of cultures. In this sense, we need to know, more or less, features of these cultures if we want to have a better conununication with other people. As one of the key elements of a culture, the dialect, to a large degree, shows the specific features of the local culture.
Besides, having witnessed the changes in history, dialect is a reflection of ample tradition in a country. Moreover, when traveling or living in other regions, people may confront discrimination and bias if they cannot communicate with the locals in local dialect. Thus, priority and attention should be given to teaching at least one selective course in local dialect.
NO
Teaching courses in local dialect will undoubtedly make the communication more difficult.
If universities teach courses in local dialect, students’ attention will be easily distracted from what they are studying as a result of difficult communication. Thus, universities should not be advocated to teach selective courses in local dialect.
Moreover, only communicating in local dialect will breed localism which does harm to the unity and stability of the whole country.

选项

答案         University Should Teach at Least One of the Selective Courses in Local Dialect
    Recently, a survey has been made for the purpose of investigating whether it is suitable for universities to teach at least one selective course in local dialect. According to the final result, some of the interviewees suggest that they agree with the view that universities should teach at least one selective course in local dialect so as to highlight colorful tradition as well as the distinctive culture, while the rest are on the opposite side since they think that it will make the communication more difficult.
    From my own perspective, I believe that dialect should be used in selective courses for it can protect local culture, and help people gain a sense of belonging. First of all, since dialect is a symbol of local culture as well as the heritage of a region, speaking local dialect can be regarded as a necessary approach to protecting local culture. There is no doubt that globalization is a double-edged sword and is a threat to the diversity of culture. What’s more, dialect plays a very important role in our society and can be regarded as a token of identity in some places. Thus, teaching courses in local dialect can promote the protection of local culture.
    Moreover, an old saying says, " Home is where the heart is and homesickness is an incurable illness wherever we are, unless we return to the place we miss most. " So, one will have a sense of belonging if someone talks with him in local dialect. In this way, university should be advocated to teach selective courses in local dialect.
    To sum up, as one of the key elements of a culture, local dialect should be used in university selective courses for local culture can be protected and a feeling of belonging can be gained.

解析     通过审题得知,本话题讨论的是大学里是否应该至少有一门选修课用方言来授课。在写作时需注意以下几点:1.只要论点合理,论据可靠,正反两个观点任选其一皆可。2.立场要坚定,侧重一方来说。如果反对大学用方言授课,应突出方言授课的弊端,强调可能出现的一些问题,比如造成沟通困难,滋生狭隘的地方主义等。如果支持大学使用方言授课,那么文章应重点强调用方言授课的优势,突出方言的重要性,比如可以保护传统文化,使人具有归属感等,以此来证明使用方言授课的必要性和迫切性。在具体行文方面,考生要先概述正反方观点,然后给出自己的观点,最后总结全文。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3740614.html
最新回复(0)