首页
登录
职称英语
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’
游客
2024-09-02
43
管理
问题
A New Approach to Debate
I. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’ 【T1】______【T1】______
II. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau to teachers
a) Begin with controlled practice: to【T2】______opinions and arguments【T2】______
b) Caution: no【T3】______topics 【T3】______
III. "Discover Debate" Approach
Team members: depending on the【T4】______of students 【T4】______
The first stage: creating a【T5】______aid【T5】______
The second stage: presenting arguments
The third stage: answering the【T6】______argument 【T6】______
a) Pause for the opponents to develop answers or【T7】______【T7】______
b) Evaluate arguments: to look for【T8】______ . 【T8】______
c) Write easily remembered【T9】______【T9】______
Ending: ask for audience 【T10】______【T10】______ [br] 【T7】
A New Approach to Debate
(1)Teachers of English may hesitate to teach debate because they think it is beyond their students’ language ability, or proficiency. But debate can be a powerful tool. It can help students learn to speak naturally and to listen carefully.
Professor Charles Lebeau teaches English and debate in Japan. He wrote "Discover Debate" with Michael Lubetsky. The book helps English teachers and learners understand how to carry on a simple debate.
The "Discover Debate" approach has three stages: creating a visual aid to communicate an argument, presenting the argument and answering the other team’s argument. Each stage puts increasing demands on language ability. It begins with a pre-debate experience.
When teaching debate to English learners, Mr. Lebeau recommends beginning with "controlled practice." Students work in pairs to practice saying opinions and giving reasons in short conversations. (2)They learn to identify opinions and arguments about everyday topics, such as sports stars, foods, weather and habits.
(3)Teachers may be tempted to give students serious topics, such as "People should stop using nuclear power." However, Mr. Lebeau cautions that English learners may not have the necessary language ability to handle such topics. More serious topics often require special vocabulary and research.
Mr. Lebeau’s classes in Japan are like many in universities; they have 40 to 50 students. (4)He has students form debate teams of three or six, depending on the total number of students. (5)Each_team creates a visual aid to show their thinking on the topic. The visual is a house: a roof represents an opinion, pillars are the reasons supporting the opinion and the foundation is the evidence.
In the next stage, students present their argument. They have to do some talking, but not too much.
(6)The third stage is answering the opponents’ argument. Here, debaters need a higher level of language ability. (7)Mr. Lebeau recommends pausing for the opposing team to develop their answers, or refutations. Each team might go to a different area and discuss the weak points in the opposing argument. Students must first think about the arguments carefully. In "Discover Debate," Michael Lubetsky and Charles Lebeau include a guide to help students evaluate arguments. The evaluation also takes advantage of the visual aid of a house. (8)Students are asked to look for flaws, or problems. They identify things that are either "not true" or "not important."
(9)Students can write easily remembered abbreviations on their opponents’ houses: "NT" for not true, "NAT" for not always true, or "NNT" for not necessarily true. These simple expressions make it easier for students to refute their opponents’ arguments.
Traditional debate includes several cycles of presentation and refutation. For English learners, one cycle of presentation and refutation is usually enough practice. Mr. Lebeau says sometimes he asks the rest of the class to vote on which side won. (10)Asking for audience feedback gives the lesson a good ending. But, he says, additional discussion depends on the situation and the level of the students.
选项
答案
refutations
解析
本题与第三阶段反驳对方观点相关。录音提到:“勒博先生建议暂停让对方辩友构思答辩或者辩驳”,因此填入refutations。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3739955.html
相关试题推荐
Acutehearinghelpsmostanimalssensetheapproachofthunderstormslongbefore
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
DebateaboutproposalstoraisetheretirementageofChineseworkershasbeenr
DebateaboutproposalstoraisetheretirementageofChineseworkershasbeenr
DebateaboutproposalstoraisetheretirementageofChineseworkershasbeenr
随机试题
ExerciseIsGoodforYourBodyandYourMind[A]Thebenefits
试述感性认识和理性认识辩证关系的原理,并说明这一原理的理论和实践意义。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
下列不属于食物中毒特征的是A、食物中毒的发病必然与近期进食某种食物有关,凡是未进
下列描述中,不属于表达歌唱状态的词语是() A.头腔共鸣 B.明
按照当事人分类,索赔不包括( )。A、承包人与发包人之间的索赔 B、承包人与
如果市场上一共有300只基金,其中五星级基金有30只,投资者任意从这300只基金
下列符合干式报警阀组安装要求的是()。A.安装在不发生冰冻的场所 B.安装完成
(2020年真题)银行应建立清晰的信贷准入和退出的政策,明确对客户开办某项信贷业
有关汞中毒的解救措施,错误的是A.可以用二巯丙磺钠驱汞 B.可以用二巯丙醇驱汞
最新回复
(
0
)