首页
登录
职称英语
Read carefully the following excerpt, and then write your response in NO LES
Read carefully the following excerpt, and then write your response in NO LES
游客
2024-08-25
6
管理
问题
Read carefully the following excerpt, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should:
1) Summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then
2) Comment on whether it is necessary to go vegetarians or not. You should support yourself with information from the excerpt.
Giving up meat can make our planet better. Whether this is true or not is debated widely. The following are two different opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your view on the issue.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Can Going Vegetarians Save Our Planet?
Many people are surprised to learn that livestock farming is responsible for a high level of green house gas emissions, which are known to cause global warming. One study estimates that the farming of animals causes more emissions (18%) than the world’s entire transport system (13.5%). There are even more interesting statistics about the impact that livestock have on global warming. For example, nitrous oxide is almost 300 times more damaging to the climate than carbon dioxide, and 65% of the total quantity produced comes from livestock. Methane is another gas that causes global warming, and cows and sheep are responsible for 37% of total methane emissions.
However, for most of human history, cattle, sheep and goats have eaten the grass on land that is not suitable for growing crops or grain. By doing this, they convert grass that is inedible into meat and milk. Even today, sheep or goats can be the most efficient way to get food from some land. In a world where more than a billion people do not have enough food to eat, taking this land out of the food production process would create even less food security for many people. Moreover, when land is very dry or hilly, grazing by livestock often causes much less damage to the environment than growing crops.
选项
答案
Can Going Vegetarians Save Our Planet?
Whether becoming a vegetarian or meat eater helps better our environment has been ever discussed widely. The excerpt reveals two conflicting ideas. One claims that eating meat or raising livestock has a harmful impact on our natural environment while the other argues that stock farming takes advantage of unproductive land and also provides a solution to food scarcity. It seems that either side makes sense.
According to supporters for vegetarians in the excerpt, eating meat means a large number of livestock to be raised. This, with some proven statistics, would result in the increase of carbon emission, consequently leading to global warming. However, long before the Industrial Revolution, meat production had existed, which did not cause the rise of temperature as it does now. In this way, only overgrazing creates many problems, including damage to grass root, carbon emission and maybe deforestation.
However, opponents think that farming of animals could create sufficient food and make the best of poor land such as hills or dry land. Compared with the negative effects on the environment by crop growth, animal farming seems to damage less. Admittedly, in land unsuitable to grow crops, it is a good idea to raise livestock to produce more food as well as effectively use the land. However, in fertile land, farming animals may not be a good choice. It runs at the cost of cutting trees to make room for cattle and sheep, which may instead bring more problems to locals.
In summary, animal farming in barren land may help produce meat and almost have no damage to the environment but it can increase carbon emission and worsen our environment. So it is a hard choice to make. More factors should be taken into consideration to come up with a final decision.
解析
在准备这一写作任务时,一定要先读所给题目说明:不吃肉是否可以让我们的星球更好。在这一基础上,我们才能对所给短文进行正确的理解。文中提出两种观点,一方面认为吃肉加剧了全球变暖,有数据为证;另一方面则认为吃肉不仅解决食物问题,而且和种植粮食作物相比造成的环境破坏少。因此,所给材料集中的冲突在于吃肉对环境的影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3735253.html
相关试题推荐
Readcarefullythefollowingexcerpt,andthenwriteyourresponseinNOLES
Readcarefullythefollowingexcerptoninternationaltourismargumentinth
ReadcarefullythefollowingexcerptandthenwriteyourresponseinNOLESS
YouaredoingaminiresearchprojectonInternetusers.Thefollowingares
Readcarefullythefollowingexcerpt,andthenwriteyourresponseinNOLES
Readcarefullythefollowingexcerptonhistoricalbuildings,andthenwrite
ReadcarefullythefollowingexcerptonstandardizedtestargumentintheUS
Aboutteno’clockonthefollowingmorning,dirtyandhungry,Iwasdragging
WhichofthefollowingsentencesdoesNOThaveapredicative?A、Youshouldstayc
Whichofthefollowingsentencesexpressesprobability?A、HemustpayMr.Farnham
随机试题
Whytalkscannotbetookplace?[br][originaltext]TheUnitedNationstopdipl
[originaltext]M:Hi,Betty,it’snicetoseeyouhere.Thankgodthefinalexam
下面的描述中属于工作区子系统区域范围的是()A.实现楼层设备间之间的连接 B
麻醉两侧舌神经后将出现A.舌后1/3味觉消失 B.舌部诸肌松弛 C.舌不能伸
急性上呼吸道感染最常见的病原体是( )。A.细菌 B.病毒 C.支原体
简述中学德育要遵循哪些基本原则
下列可以抗前列腺增生症的药物有A.β受体阻断剂 B.M胆碱受体激动药 C
(2018年真题)乙公司是甲公司购入的子公司,丙公司是甲公司设立的子公司。甲公司
评标委员会在对某工程项目评标过程中,发现个别投标文件中存在某些错误,则评标委员会
男,20岁,感冒后7天出现颜面及双下肢水肿,尿少,查体:血压160/100mmH
最新回复
(
0
)