首页
登录
职称英语
A group of scientists known for their skepticism about climate change has re
A group of scientists known for their skepticism about climate change has re
游客
2024-08-02
16
管理
问题
A group of scientists known for their skepticism about climate change has reanalysed two centuries’ worth of global temperature records. Their study largely confirms previous ones: it finds strong evidence that Earth is getting hotter.
"The valid issues raised by climate skeptics, when addressed fully and in detail, do not significantly change the answer," says lead author Richard Muller of the University of California, Berkeley. In a testimony(证据)to the US Congress earlier this year, Muller questioned whether global temperature records showed a significant warming during the 20th century. His project, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature(BEST), has now pulled together global temperature data going back to 1800 from 15 sources, including datasets held by the World Meteorological Organization and US and UK government agencies.
BEST concludes that land temperatures have risen by 1°C since the 1950s. This is largely in line with the three existing global temperature records: GISTEMP, maintained by NASA, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s GHCN and HadCRU, kept by the UK Met Office. The 1°C of warming reflects warming above land masses only, so is not yet a truly global estimate.
In a series of papers that have not yet been estimated but are available on the BEST website, the researchers examine how reliable the temperature data is. Contrary to earlier studies that are often quoted by climate skeptics, the BEST researchers find that including data from weather stations in cities—which are warmer than rural areas—makes little difference to the overall trend. "Urban warming doesn’t unduly(过分地)bias estimates of recent global temperature change," they say.
Blogger Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That has repeatedly claimed that temperature data is unreliable because weather stations are poorly placed—for instance, next to air-conditioning vents or other heat sources. However, BEST found no statistically significant difference in the trends seen at well-placed and poorly placed stations. [br] According to Blogger Anthony Watts, why is temperature data unreliable?
选项
A、The data is from air-conditioning vents.
B、Cities have little difference with rural areas.
C、Weather stations are all in cities.
D、The weather stations are improperly placed.
答案
D
解析
由题干中的Blogger Anthony Watts和temperature data unreliable定位到第五段第一句。该句说明了气温数据的不可靠是由于那些气象站的位置都不合适,D)是对该句的同义转述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3702928.html
相关试题推荐
Changethefirstwordintothelastword,bychangingoneletteratatimeandm
Chocolatecouldsoonbeathingofthepast,afterscientistswarnedthatthe
Chocolatecouldsoonbeathingofthepast,afterscientistswarnedthatthe
Chocolatecouldsoonbeathingofthepast,afterscientistswarnedthatthe
Chocolatecouldsoonbeathingofthepast,afterscientistswarnedthatthe
Whichwillreduceclimate-relatedriskandvulnerabilities?[br][originaltext]
Whichwillreduceclimate-relatedriskandvulnerabilities?[br][originaltext]
Whichwillreduceclimate-relatedriskandvulnerabilities?[originaltext]Inthi
Changethefirstwordofthethirdpairinthesamewayastheotherpairstogi
Changethefirstwordofthethirdpairinthesamewayastheotherpairstogi
随机试题
Thesetwokindsofwinesarebothmade______grain.A、ofB、intoC、fromD、inC本题考
Doctorsinitiallyfearedthatantibioticswouldhave______effect,destroyinghea
[originaltext]Joeisastudentatacollegeinanurbanarea.Duringhisfi
高中体育《创编健美操》主要教学过程及板书设计 教学过程 (一)开始部分 1.体委整队、报告人数、师生问好。 2.宣布本课内容、教学目标,提出教学要求。
速尿的适应证有()A.急性肾衰竭 B.急性肺水肿 C.轻症高血压 D.
患者,女,3个月,单纯性母乳喂养,突发消化道出血,肝脏肋下1cm,脾未扪及,查H
《义务教育生物学课程标准(2011年版)》规定义务教育阶段生物学课程内容包括10
细辛的药用部位是A.根及根茎 B.干燥茎 C.肉质茎 D.茎叶 E.草质
当归补血汤中当归与黄芪的比例为A.1:2 B.1:5 C.2:1 D.5:
根据站用直流电源系统精益化评价细则,330kV及以上电压等级变电站及重要的22
最新回复
(
0
)