首页
登录
职称英语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
游客
2024-08-01
36
管理
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject. [br] In student ratings all the following questions can be asked EXCEPT______.
选项
A、Can the teacher make himself easily understood?
B、How does the teacher deal with students?
C、Is what is taught new?
D、Are students interested in what is taught?
答案
C
解析
该题目一方面考查考生对细节的把握,另一方面考查考生能否理解文章中的一些话语。本题答案来自全文最后一句,A)对应abilityto communicate at the students’level;B)对应relationship with students;D)对应ability toarouse interest in the subject,这三项都可以在学生评价体系中提问,因此可排除。C)实际上是对应第四段第三句中的whether the materials usedin a course are up to date,这类问题应由教师的同事来回答,不属于询问学生的问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3701479.html
相关试题推荐
Bothsidesintheconflictagreedto______.A、conversetoproblemsB、exchangeth
Weareourselvesprofoundlychangedbyourinteractionwithmodemtechnology
Weareourselvesprofoundlychangedbyourinteractionwithmodemtechnology
Weareourselvesprofoundlychangedbyourinteractionwithmodemtechnology
Takingapagefromsciencefiction,engineersattheNationalAeronauticsan
Takingapagefromsciencefiction,engineersattheNationalAeronauticsan
Simon:Excuseme,butcouldyougivemesomechange?Joan:Letmesee.______.S
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextrat
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextrat
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextrat
随机试题
Iftheproductisinshortsupplyrelativetothedemand,thepricewillbebid
师爱的四种主要的心理功能是什么?
喉黏液囊肿最常见的部位是A.声门下 B.喉室 C.会厌舌面 D.室带 E
反映公司营运能力的具体指标主要有()。A.总资产周转率 B.应收账款周转
以下应当召开临时会员大会的情形包括()。 ①理事人数不足规定的最低人数②
患儿,女,8岁,因低热盗汗前来就诊。为明确诊断需做OT试验,一般使用OT稀释液的
有着多年美国教学经历的纽约大学教授陈宇新认为:美国的“快乐教育”并不一定能教育出
职业道德建设是先进性与广泛性的统一,其要求是( )。A.倡导“先进”,但要给
药物微囊化的特点不包括A.可改善制剂外观 B.可提高药物稳定性 C.可掩盖药
某从事专用设备及计算机设备生产销售(先进制造业)企业2019年3月底留抵
最新回复
(
0
)