首页
登录
职称英语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
游客
2024-08-01
37
管理
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject. [br] What can we learn from the passage?
选项
A、Student evaluations of teachers are popular because they are very accurate.
B、In student ratings, students should not be asked questions that require professional background.
C、Student ratings can be used under any circumstances.
D、All colleges are inclined to use student ratings to evaluate teachers.
答案
B
解析
此类题一般考查文章的细节,因此在解答该类型题目时,一定要仔细研读各选项,看清楚选项与原文的异同。A)与第三段首句意思相悖;C)、D)中存在any和All两个绝对性词汇,并且原文中并未提及,也是干扰项;B)与第四段第三、四句含义一致,因此是正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3701478.html
相关试题推荐
WillRussiachangetheclocktowintertimethisautumn?[originaltext]Russiaha
Changeoneletteronlyfromeachwordtoformawell-knownphrase.weailanya
Whenwillthewhetherchange?[originaltext]Welcometothemiddayweatherupdate
Foreigncurrencycanbe_____forRMBatanybankinChina.A、exchangedB、switche
Thefreezingpointisthetemperature_____waterchangesintoice.A、atwhichB、o
Itissaidthatthesuddenchangeinweather_____manypeople’shealth.A、hasaf
Everymonththegroupmeets,soitsmemberscan_____theirviews.A、changeB、imply
We’dliketocanceltheorderforthegoodsbecauseofthechangeinthehomema
Shetriedhard,butshestillcdtildn’tmakeusourmind.A、tochangeB、changedC
Animalsreacttothechangingseasonswithchangesinmoodandbehaviorandh
随机试题
Weallscreamforwater【C1】______thirsty.Butdoyouknowinveryhot,dryw
Thispartistotestyourabilitytodopracticalwriting.Youarerequired
Someteenagersharborageneralizedresentmentagainstsociety,which______the
Peoplecannowavoidhavingtosortthroughalbumsfromseveraldifferentfr
聚氯乙烯对蛋白质的吸附性能与聚苯乙烯相比( )。A.略低 B.无法比较 C
长期以来,有很多项目经理只关注项目是否按期完成和质量情况,缺少对成本的责任控制,
下列()不属于卫生保健资源在卫生事业内部进行分配的要求A.应坚持治疗与预防相
体育课分组教学的形式,一般有分组不轮换和()。A.先合后分 B.两组一轮换
非公开募集基金管理人实行登记制度,需向()登记。A.中国证监会 B.中国人民
某混凝土试块强度值不满足规范要求,但经法定检测单位对混凝土实体强度经过法定检测后
最新回复
(
0
)