首页
登录
职称英语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
游客
2024-08-01
43
管理
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject. [br] The central idea of the passage is that______.
选项
A、student ratings are the only source of information on teaching effectiveness
B、ratings have become the most widely used source of information on teaching effectiveness
C、besides student ratings, there are other methods to evaluate teachers
D、student ratings are very popular and should be properly used
答案
D
解析
本题询问文章的中心思想,答案应来自文章主题句或根据文章结构总结得出。纵览全文,作者一直在谈论学生评价体系,前两段讲述学生评价体系被广泛使用后两段讲述应如何科学地使用学生评价体系,因此本题答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3701475.html
相关试题推荐
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextrat
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextrat
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextrat
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextrat
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
随机试题
•Readtheatriclebelowabouttheneedofemployees.•Choosethecorrect
[originaltext]W:IknowyouandJaneusedtodoeveiythingtogether.Ithought
Haveyoueverheardtheoldsaying"Neverjudgeabookbyitscover"?This
Manydoctorsknowthestoryof’MrWright’.In1957hewasdiagnosedwithc
河南郭亮村位于太行山一处绝壁环抱之中,这里海拔1700米,岩石以砂岩为主。下图为
某建设工程项目分包工程发生生产安全事故,负责向安全生产监督管理部门、建设行政主管
充血性心力衰竭时肾小球滤过分数增加主要是因为A.肾小球滤过率升高B.肾血浆流量增
下列与心力衰竭时心肌收缩功能障碍有关的是A、钠钙交换体Ca2+亲和力下降 B、
在相近的运行和检测条件下,同一间隔设备的同一状态量不应有明显差异,否则应进行显著
建设工程项目的工作流程图随工程进展应该()。 A.逐层细化 B.
最新回复
(
0
)