首页
登录
职称英语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too litt
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too litt
游客
2024-06-10
10
管理
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠) and stagnation(呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness(分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perception of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-making organizations and others for not-fur-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in term of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organization, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions. [br] The passage suggests that in for-profit organizations_______.
选项
A、there is no end of conflict
B、expression of different opinions is encouraged
C、decisions must be justifiable
D、success lies in general agreement
答案
D
解析
本题为逻辑推断题,由第四段可知,分歧能导致一些不明智的决策,即成功依赖于意见上的一致,所以选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3628230.html
相关试题推荐
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolitt
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolitt
Conventionalwisdomhasitthatmalebirdsareloyalandfaithfulbecauseth
Conventionalwisdomhasitthatmalebirdsareloyalandfaithfulbecauseth
[originaltext]M:YoumustbeprettyexcitedaboutyourtriptoEurope.Whenare
[originaltext]M:YoumustbeprettyexcitedaboutyourtriptoEurope.Whenare
[originaltext]M:YoumustbeprettyexcitedaboutyourtriptoEurope.Whenare
Whathesaid____________(与警方的证据相矛盾).conflictedwiththepolice’sevidence
CrossCulturalConflictResolutioninTeams
CrossCulturalConflictResolutioninTeams
随机试题
SarrElysetookasipfromaplasticcup.Likeapractisedwinetaster,she
A.annoyingB.counterpartsC.becauseD.movingE.inheritedF.narrowe
19世纪末20世纪初,资产阶级维新派认为中国要取得民族生存和国家独立,只有实行维
分析项目盈利能力的主要指标有()。Ⅰ.财务净现值;Ⅱ.财务内部收益率;Ⅲ.投
初始地籍调查成果资料的表现形式可以是( )。A.文字档案 B.各种图册 C
(2020年真题)下列关于监管部门对全国股转系统业务监管措施的说法,错误的是(
根据下列资料回答问题。 以下为某省的人口失业率图表。其中,黑色部分表示该省全省
某钢筋混凝土条形基础埋深d=1.5m,基础宽b=1.2m,传至基础底面的竖向荷载
毛细水强烈上升高度是指()。A.受地下水直接补给的毛细水上升的最大高度 B
下列申请人从中国取得的所得为股息时,不属于直接判定申请人具有“受益所有人”身份的
最新回复
(
0
)