首页
登录
职称英语
Principles in Japanese Organizations During the 19
Principles in Japanese Organizations During the 19
游客
2024-06-04
2
管理
问题
Principles in Japanese Organizations
During the 1970s and 1980s, American managers invested much time and money studying Japanese approaches to management because of the fine quality of Japanese products and the general productivity of their organizations. While the American and Japanese cultures differ significantly in many ways, it is still possible to examine Jap0nese management and discover several relevant principles.
Extensive studies of Japanese organizations have demonstrated that Japanese managers stress the following:
Bottom-up Initiative
Japanese managers believe that change and initiative within an organization should come from those closest to the problem. So they elicit(引起) change from below. Top-level Japanese managers see their task as creating an atmosphere in which subordinates are motivated to seek better solutions. The difference is that Western style decision-making proceeds mostly from top management and often does not consult middle management or the worker while in Japan, ideas can be created at the lowest levels, travel upward through an organization and have an impact on the eventual decision. This is "bottom up".
Top Management as Motivator
Japanese managers do not view themselves as having all the answers. When a subordinate brings in a proposal, the manager neither accepts nor rejects it. Rather, he tactfully, politely asks questions, makes suggestions, and provides encouragement.
Middle Management as Impetus for and Shaper of Solutions
In the Japanese system, junior (middle) managers are initiators who perceive problems and formulate tentative (尝试的) solutions in coordination with others. They are not functional specialists who carry out their boss’s directives. Because so much emphasis is placed on coordination and integration,’ solutions to problems evolve more slowly, but they are known and understood by all those who have been a part of the solution generation process. Horizontal communication is stressed as essential to the coordination of problem-solving efforts.
Consensus(多数人的意见) as a Way of Making Decisions
The Japanese are less inclined to think in terms of absolutes, that is, the solution (which is right) versus the alternatives (which are wrong). Rather, they recognize a range of alternatives, several of which might work and all of which possess advantages and disadvantages. When a group makes a decision, all members become committed to the chosen solution. From a Japanese perspective, that commitment, and the ensuing dedication toward working to make the solution successful, is probably more important than the objective quality of the decision. The Japanese have an interesting concept of consensus. Those who consent to a decision are not necessarily endorsing(签署) it. Rather, consent means that each person is satisfied that his point of view has been fairly heard, and although he or she may not wholly agree that the decision is the best one, he or she is willing to go along with it and even support it.
Concern for Employees’ Personal Well-being
Japanese managers have a kind of paternalistic (家长试作风的) attitude toward their employees. Traditionally, Japanese organizations have offered their workers housing, extensive recreational facilities, and lifetime employment. The Japanese believe that it is impossible to divorce a worker’s personal and professional lives. Good managers express concern for workers as persons with homes and families as well as for the quality of the products the workers produce. Managers typically work alongside their subordinates, counsel them regarding their personal lives, and encourage much peer interaction.
Advantage or Disadvantage
It is interesting that principles that are considered, Joy many to be advantages of the Japanese system can also be viewed as problems, at least from an American perspective. There is a fine line between encouraging consensus and forcing it. When groups place too much emphasis on being agreeable and conforming to organizational expectations, poor quality decision making is a likely outcome. Moreover, the Japanese notion of taking care of employees can extend into an extreme form of paternalism with which few well-educated Americans would be comfortable. It is appropriate to protect children or others who cannot think for or look after themselves. But professionals hardly fall into these categories. Most Americans would prefer an organizational system that makes it possible for them to function as mature, intelligent human beings, responsible for their own security and well-being.
Some authors have suggested that Japanese style management as adapted to American organizations is little more than a tool for even greater management control. An employee who has a life commitment to a particular organization, for instance, becomes vulnerable. Since he does not perceive practical options, he is more likely to tolerate existing working conditions, even if he finds them unpleasant. The employee is also encouraged to become a generalist rather than a specialist. Thus, a person’s expertise in a particular area is rarely sufficiently developed so that the organization actually grows to depend on him or her as an irreplaceable employee. Instead, substitutes are readily found. Moreover, should an employee who has worked in this kind of organizational environment decide to abandon his commitment to this organization after a few years of working as a generalist, he would be poorly equipped to move into other American organizations since he would be competing with specialists.
Hardly Suited to American Organizations
The body of research on Japanese organizations continues to grow. Recent research suggests that one cannot generalize about Japanese workers—that males and females, young and old, differ in their decision-making style and management preference. One study reported that Japanese workers were more passive than commonly thought, preferring to be persuaded of the value of a decision by their supervisor over making the decision themselves. However, a different study found that Japanese managers place afar greater emphasis on corporate participation and cooperation than their American counterparts. Thus, a consistent and coherent view of Japanese organizations does not yet exist.
Like the other approaches to management, the Japanese approach is very interesting. In reminding us of the value of the individual, the need for consensus decision making, and the potential of motivating management, it has been extremely useful. It is not a panacea(万能药), however. Because of extreme differences between the Japanese and American cultures, some Japanese management practices are simply poorly suited to American organizations. [br] In Japanese system the emphasis is placed on ________.
选项
答案
coordination and integration
解析
见文章的第三个小标题:“Because so much emphasis is placed on coordination and integration, solutions to problems evolve more slowly.”日本的企业强凋合作和团结。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3619829.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
[originaltext]W:Willyoutakethesebookstothelibraryduringyourlunchhou
Duringthatterriblefaminealotofpeoplehad_____________(没有选择,只能吃草和树叶).no
Patientswithnighteatingsyndromeoftenwakeupmultipletimesduringthe.nig
Withmoreelectricalhouseholdappliancescomingintobeingduringthetwentieth
随机试题
SevenWaystoCreateaHappyHouseholdA)Everyfamilyisdifferent,wit
企业违法从事建筑活动的,由违法行为发生地的()以上地方入民政府住房城乡建设主管
在人事管理系统中,计算企业员工的报酬可以利用面向对象的( )技术,使系统可以用
集料的堆积密度试验是将集料按规定的方法装填于密度筒中,集料的堆积体积由()体积组
公司贷款又称企业贷款或者对公贷款,是以企事业单位为对象发放的贷款,主要包括(
在Photoshop中,为了确定“魔棒工具”对图像边缘的敏感程度。应调整下列哪个
法律区别于道德规范、宗教规范、风俗习惯、社会礼仪、职业规范等其他社会规范的首要之
抵押物由于外部环境变化引起的贬值或增值称为()。A.实体性贬值 B.功能性贬
项目监理机构应签发《工程暂停令》的情形是( )。A.施工单位未按审查通过的工程设
变配电所二次回路控制电缆芯线截面为1.5mm2时,其芯数不宜超过下列哪一项数值?
最新回复
(
0
)