首页
登录
职称英语
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, u
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, u
游客
2024-06-01
14
管理
问题
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, using science for the construction of what we call modern civilization. Every dispensable item of contemporary technology, from canal locks to dial telophones to penicillin, was pieced together from the analysis of data provided by one or another series of scientific experiments. Three hundred years seems a long time for testing a new approach to human inter-living, long enough to set back for critical appraisal of the scientific method, maybe even long enough to vote on whether to go on with it or not. There is an argument.
Voices have been raised in protest since the beginning, rising in pitch and violence in the nineteenth century during the early stages of the industrial revolution, summoning urgent crowds into the streets on the issue of nuclear energy. "Give it hack," say some of the voices, "It doesn’t really work, we’ve tried it and it doesn’t work. Go back three hundred years and start again on something else less chancy for the race of man."
The principle discoveries in this century, taking all in all, are the glimpses of the depth of our ignorance of nature. Things that used to seem clear and rational, and matters of absolute certainty—Newtonian mechanics, for example—have slipped through our fingers; and we are left with a new set of gigantic puzzles, cosmic uncertainties, and ambiguities. Some of the laws of physics are amended every few years; some are canceled outright; some undergo revised versions of legislative intent as if they were acts of Congress.
Just thirty years ago we call it a biological revolution when the fantastic geometry of the DNA molecule was exposed to public view and the linear language of genetics was decoded. For a while, things seamed simple and clear: the cell was a neat little machine, a mechanical device ready for taking to pieces and reassembling, like a tiny watch. But just in the last few years it has become almost unbelievably complex, filled with strange parts whose functions are beyond today’s imagining.
It is not just that there is more to do, there is everything to do. What lies ahead, or what can lie ahead if the efforts in basic research are continued, is much more than the conquest of human disease or the improvement of agricultural technology or the cultivation of nutrients in the sea. As we learn more about fundamental processes of living things in general we will learn more about ourselves. [br] The principle discovery in this century shows ______.
选项
A、man has overthrown Newton’s laws of physics
B、man has solved a new set of gigantic puzzles
C、man has lost many scientific discoveries
D、man has given up some of the once accepted theories
答案
D
解析
推断题。由文章第三段最后一句可知,人类对已有理论所采取的做法是修正或摈弃,所以D正确。A、 B对应第三段第二句,曲解了文章原意,C文中并未提及,均应排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3615615.html
相关试题推荐
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
TheFoodandDrugAdministrationsaidonWednesdaythatitistryingtotrack
TheFoodandDrugAdministrationsaidonWednesdaythatitistryingtotrack
TheFoodandDrugAdministrationsaidonWednesdaythatitistryingtotrack
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
随机试题
下列关于对冲基金的说法错误的是()。A、共同基金即是对冲过的基金B、对冲基金是采取公开募集方式以避开管制,并通过大量金融工具投资获取高回报率的共同基
慢性病的主要风险因素是不健康的生活习惯,如不健康的饮食、缺乏运动和体力活动、吸烟
“使用不同的毛笔、刻刀等工具以及宣纸、刻石等材料,体验不同的艺术效果”属于高中美
私募基金管理人未按规定及时填报业务数据或者进行信息更新的,基金业协会责令改正;一
A.半夏B.瓜蒌C.白芥子D.川贝母E.桔梗治疗阴虚燥咳,宜选用的药物是
想要通过业务流程管理模式取得成功,企业必须做好的基础工作是()。A:建立有效的
患者,女,56岁,诊断为直肠癌晚期。家属因担心患者无法承受打击而向其隐瞒病情。但
“家有三斗粮,不当孩子王"反映的是()A.教师政治地位不高 B.教师经济地位
痛觉没有()。 (A)适宜刺激(B)准确的定位 (C)明确的性质(D
对维生素D的叙述错误的是() A.维生素D的活性形式是1.25-- B.维生
最新回复
(
0
)