首页
登录
职称英语
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
游客
2024-05-29
20
管理
问题
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scientific papers is skyrocketing. What is the main reason for it? That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because US government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War Ⅱ era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.
Yet multiple authorship--however good it may be in other ways presents for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, should tile liability be joint and several, accruing to all authors? If not, then how should it be allocated among them? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review?
Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.
Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame. [br] There is a tendency that scientific papers are ______.
选项
A、getting more complicated
B、dealing with bigger problems
C、more of a product of team work
D、focusing more on natural than on social sciences
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。第一段说“这部分是因为实验室更大了,问题更加复杂,但是这也需要更多不同的附属专业,而且也是因为美国政府开始促进团队科学”。故答案为C)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3610172.html
相关试题推荐
Forme,scientificknowledgeisdividedintomathematicalsciences,natural
Forme,scientificknowledgeisdividedintomathematicalsciences,natural
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
随机试题
Ⅰ.BorrowingBooks1.Tomakesurethatthebookis【1】.【1
ItisveryimportantforstudentswhoarestudyingEnglishasasecondlangua
【S1】[br]【S6】I根据句子结构此处应为形容词;根据文意,上文说亚马逊的创始人鼓励员工把公司迅速做大,yet表转折,可见结果与希望是相违背的,因此应选
UnlikethecarefullyweighedandplannedcompositionsofDante,Goethe’swri
Placeoneeachofthedigits1—9inthegridtomakethesumswork.We’veputin
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》(GB50854-2013)规定,关于
以下关于普通股股东依法享有公司重大决策参与权的说法正确的有()。A:股东可以亲自
下列情形中,可能会导致成本推动型通货膨胀的有( )。A.垄断性大公司为获取垄断
与口腔肿瘤相关的内在因素是A.残根边缘的慢性刺激 B.吸烟饮酒 C.EB病毒
根据《城市区域环境振动标准》,居民、文教区的铅垂向Z振级标准值是( )。A.昼
最新回复
(
0
)