首页
登录
职称英语
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
游客
2024-05-29
30
管理
问题
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scientific papers is skyrocketing. What is the main reason for it? That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because US government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War Ⅱ era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.
Yet multiple authorship--however good it may be in other ways presents for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, should tile liability be joint and several, accruing to all authors? If not, then how should it be allocated among them? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review?
Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.
Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame. [br] There is a tendency that scientific papers are ______.
选项
A、getting more complicated
B、dealing with bigger problems
C、more of a product of team work
D、focusing more on natural than on social sciences
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。第一段说“这部分是因为实验室更大了,问题更加复杂,但是这也需要更多不同的附属专业,而且也是因为美国政府开始促进团队科学”。故答案为C)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3610172.html
相关试题推荐
Forme,scientificknowledgeisdividedintomathematicalsciences,natural
Forme,scientificknowledgeisdividedintomathematicalsciences,natural
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
随机试题
Themen’sWorldCupisconsideredthemostpopularsportingeventinthewor
CanBurglarsJamYourWirelessSecuritySystem?A)Anyproductth
下面你将听到一段回忆邓小平同志的发言。上个世纪70年代末,我参加了第四次全国文代会,大会上小平同志致辞时获得的长时间的热烈掌声给我留下了极深的
Amodelofthedevelopmentoftheinformationsciencesisdescribedandused
[originaltext]ThenumberofspeakersofEnglishinShakespeare’stimeises
Fromchildhoodtooldage,wealluselanguageasameansofbroadeningour
如果永久持有股票,则投资于股票所得到的未来现金流量是()。A.股利和本金之和
A.调脾散 B.参苓白术散 C.养阴增液汤 D.四君子汤 E.七味白术散
通风系统按照( ),分为进气式通风和排气式通风。A.操作原理 B.特征 C
按照《行政复议法》规定,公民、法人或者其他组织认为具体行政行为侵犯其合法权益的,
最新回复
(
0
)