首页
登录
职称英语
Google’s Plan for World’s Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of
Google’s Plan for World’s Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of
游客
2024-05-21
4
管理
问题
Google’s Plan for World’s Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of Piracy?
In recent years, teams of workers dispatched by Google have been working hard to make digital copies of books. So far, Google has scanned more than 10 million titles from libraries in America and Europe — including half a million volumes held by the Bodleian in Oxford. The exact method it uses is unclear; the company does not allow outsiders to observe the process.
Why is Google undertaking such a venture? Why is it even interested in all those out-of-print library books, most of which have been gathering dust on forgotten shelves for decades? The company claims its motives are essentially public-spirited. Its overall mission, after all, is to "organise the world’s information", so it would be odd if that information did not include books.
The company likes to present itself as having lofty aspirations. "This really isn’t about making money. We are doing this for the good of society." As Santiago de la Mora, head of Google Books for Europe, puts it: "By making it possible to search the millions of books that exist today, we hope to expand the frontiers of human knowledge."
Dan Clancy, the chief architect of Google Books, does seem genuine in his conviction that this is primarily a philanthropic (慈善的) exercise. "Google’s core business is search and find, so obviously what helps improve Google’s search engine is good for Google," he says. "But we have never built a spreadsheet (电子数据表) outlining the financial benefits of this, and I have never had to justify the amount I am spending to the company’s founders."
It is easy, talking to Clancy and his colleagues, to be swept along by their missionary passion. But Google’s book-scanning project is proving controversial. Several opponents have recently emerged, ranging from rival tech giants such as Microsoft and Amazon to small bodies representing authors and publishers across the world. In broad terms, these opponents have levelled two sets of criticisms at Google.
First, they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving the world’s books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company. In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books, Robert Darnton, the head of Harvard University’s library, argued that because such books are a common resource — the possession of us all — only public, not-for-profit bodies should be given the power to control them.
The second related criticism is that Google’s scanning of books is actually illegal. This allegation has led to Google becoming mired in (PS A) a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case in Charles Dickens’ Bleak House look straightforward.
At its centre, however, is one simple issue: that of copyright. The inconvenient fact about most books, to which Google has arguably paid insufficient attention, is that they are protected by copyright. Copyright laws differ from country to country, but in general protection extends for the duration of an author’s life and for a substantial period afterwards, thus allowing the author’s heirs to benefit. (In Britain and America, this post-death period is 70 years.) This means, of course, that almost all of the books published in the 20th century are still under copyright — and the last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined. Of the roughly 40 million books in US libraries, for example, an estimated 32 million are in copyright. Of these, some 27 million are out of print.
Outside the US, Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thus in the "public domain" (works such as the Bodleian’s first edition of Middlemarch, which anyone can read for free on Google Books Search).
But, within the US, the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works. In its defence, Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are in copyright — arguing that such displays are "fair use". But critics allege that by making electronic copies of these books without first seeking the permission of copyright holders, Google has committed piracy.
"The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied only once authors have expressly given their permission," says Piers Blofeld, of the Sheil Land literary agency in London. "Google has reversed this — it has simply copied all these works without bothering to ask."
In 2005, the Authors Guild of America, together with a group of US publishers, launched a class action suit (集团诉讼) against Google that, after more than two years of negotiation, ended with an announcement last October that Google and the claimants had reached an out-of-court settlement. The full details are complicated — the text alone runs to 385 pages — and trying to summarise it is no easy task. "Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible," says Blofeld, one of the settlement’s most vocal British critics.
Broadly, the deal provides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors and publishers whose rights it has breached (including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates from their works). In exchange for this, the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future.
This settlement hands Google the power — but only with the agreement of individual rights holders — to exploit its database of out-of-print books. It can include them in subscription deals sold to libraries or sell them individually under a consumer licence. It is these commercial provisions that are proving the settlement’s most controversial aspect.
Critics point out that, by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database, the settlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the company’s role from provider of information to seller. "Google’s business model has always been to provide information for free, and sell advertising on the basis of the traffic this generates," points out James Grimmelmann, associate professor at New York Law School. Now. he says, because of the settlement’s provisions, Google could become a significant force in bookselling.
Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on "orphan" works, where there is no known copyright holder — these make up an estimated 5-10% of the books Google has scanned. Under the settlement, when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work, commercial control automatically reverts to Google. Google will be able to display up to 20% of orphan works for free, include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer licence.
It is by no means certain that the settlement will be enacted (执行) — it is the subject of a fairness hearing in the US courts. But if it is enacted, Google will in effect be off the hook as far as copyright violations in the US are concerned. Many people are seriously concerned by this — and the company is likely to face challenges in other courts around the world.
No one knows the precise use Google will make of the intellectual property it has gained by scanning the world’s library books, and the truth, as Gleick, an American science writer and member of the Authors Guild, points out, is that the company probably doesn’t even know itself. But what is certain is that, in some way or other, Google’s entrance into digital bookselling will have a significant impact on the book world in the years to come. [br] Books whose copyright holders are not known are called______.
选项
答案
“orphan”works
解析
空前的are called表明,本空应填一名词(短语)。根据题干中的copyright holders和not known将本题出处定位到第16段首句。由该句where there is no known copyright holder解释的是“orphan”works可知,那些不知道版权所有者的作品被称为“orphan”works,故答案为“orphan”works。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3605015.html
相关试题推荐
Inthepast,oneofthebiggestdisadvantagesofmachineshasbeentheirina
Inthepast,oneofthebiggestdisadvantagesofmachineshasbeentheirina
Inthepast,oneofthebiggestdisadvantagesofmachineshasbeentheirina
Inthepast,oneofthebiggestdisadvantagesofmachineshasbeentheirina
Inthepast,oneofthebiggestdisadvantagesofmachineshasbeentheirina
Google’sPlanforWorld’sBiggestOnlineLibrary:PhilanthropyOrActof
Google’sPlanforWorld’sBiggestOnlineLibrary:PhilanthropyOrActof
Google’sPlanforWorld’sBiggestOnlineLibrary:PhilanthropyOrActof
Google’sPlanforWorld’sBiggestOnlineLibrary:PhilanthropyOrActof
Google’sPlanforWorld’sBiggestOnlineLibrary:PhilanthropyOrActof
随机试题
Astudyofpeoplewhousedcellphonesforanaverageoflessthanthreeyea
log510-log52= A.8 B.0 C.1 D.5
从投资费用的角度看,建筑工程造价是指建设一项工程预期开支或实际开支的()费用
在心理治疗的建立、维持治疗关系的技术中,"依据日常生活中的礼貌,以及各个治疗方法
C大小形状相同的图形看作一类图形,题干图形都由两类图形组成,选项中只有C符合。
A.4x+2y-z=0 B.4x-2y+z+3=0 C.16x+8y-16z
美国公民小丁,在我国无住所,受雇于我国境内某上市公司,担任该上市公司高级管理人员
根据《标准施工合同》,合同进度计划的主要作用有()A、监理人控制合同进度的依据
A.心排出量 B.身高 C.体表面积 D.年龄 E.体重与基础代谢率几乎
企业领用为基建工程而储备的各种物资时应借记()科目。A、工程物资 B、在建工程
最新回复
(
0
)