2. 职称英语
  3. Education in most of the developing world is shocking. Half of children in S

Education in most of the developing world is shocking. Half of children in S

游客2024-04-17  12
问题     Education in most of the developing world is shocking. Half of children in South Asia and a third of those in Africa who complete four years of schooling cannot read properly. Most governments have promised to provide universal primary education and to promote secondary education. But even when public schools exist, they often fail.
    The failure of state education, combined with the shift in emerging economies from farming to jobs that need at least a modicum(少量)of education, has caused a private-school boom. According to the World Bank, across the developing world a fifth of primary-school pupils are enrolled in private schools, twice as many as 20 years ago. So many private schools are unregistered that the real figure is likely to be much higher.
    By and large, politicians and educationalists are unenthusiastic. Governments see education as the state’s job. NGOs tend to be ideologically opposed to the private sector. The U. N. special rapporteur(报告人)on education, Kishore Singh, has said that "for-profit education should not be allowed in order to safeguard the noble cause of education".
    This attitude harms those whom educationalists claim to serve: children. The boom in private education is excellent news for them and their countries, for three reasons.
    First, it is bringing in money—not just from parents, but also from investors, some in search of a profit. Most private schools in the developing world are single operators that charge a few dollars a month, but chains are now emerging.
    Second, private schools are often better value for money than state ones. Measuring this is hard, since the children who go to private schools tend to be better off, and therefore likely to perform better. But a rigorous four-year study of 6,000 pupils in Andhra Pradesh, in southern India, suggested that private pupils performed better in English and Hindi than public-school pupils, and the private schools achieved these results at a third of the cost of the public schools.
    Lastly, private schools are innovative. Since technology has great(though as yet mostly unrealized)potential in education, this could be important. Bridge gives teachers tablets linked to a central system that provides teaching materials and monitors their work. Such robo-teaching may not be ideal, but it is better than lessons without either materials or monitoring.
    The private sector has problems. But the alternative is often a public school that is worse—or no school at all. The growth of private schools is a manifestation of the healthiest of instincts: parents’ desire to do the best for their children. Governments should therefore be asking not how to discourage private education, but how to boost it. Ideally, they would subsidize(以津贴补助)private schools, preferably through a voucher(凭证)which parents could spend at the school of their choice and top up: they would regulate schools to ensure quality: they would run public exams to help parents make informed choices. [br] Which of the following can be the title of the passage?
选项 A、Why Are Private Schools Booming So Fast?
B、Should Private Education Be Helped or Curbed?
C、How Should the Government Improve Education?
D、What Should the State Do with Public Schools?
答案 B
解析 主旨大意题。综合全文各段可知，作者从发展中国家公立教育不能适应社会发展需求谈起，指出私立教育在这些国家的发展是必然趋势。尽管遭到社会主流的质疑，但是从分析私立教育优胜于公立教育的特点来看，政府对其的态度不应是打压禁止而应是资助扶持，可见，B)的概括更为准确，故为正确答案。A)“为什么私立学校发展如此迅速?”这一点在第二段稍有提及，但不能作为全文的主题，故可排除；C)“政府应该如何改善教育?”说法过于宽泛笼统，不能准确反映本文大意，故可排除；D)“国家政府应该如何对待公立教育?”本文主要是讨论国家对私立教育的态度，故可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3558998.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)