2. 职称英语
  3. Open data sharers are still in the minority in many fields. Although many re

Open data sharers are still in the minority in many fields. Although many re

游客2024-03-12  9
问题     Open data sharers are still in the minority in many fields. Although many researchers broadly agree that public access to raw data would accelerate science, most are reluctant to post the results of their own labors online.
    Some communities have agreed to share online—geneticists, for example, post DNA Sequences at the GenBank repository (库) , and astronomers are accustomed to accessing images of galaxies and stars from, say, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, a telescope that has observed some 500 million objects—but these remain the exception, not the rule. Historically, scientists have objected to sharing for many reasons: it is a lot of work; until recently, good databases did not exist; grant funders were not pushing for sharing; it has been difficult to agree on standards for formatting data; and there is no agreed way to assign credit for data.
    But the barriers are disappearing, in part because journals and funding agencies worldwide are encouraging scientists to make their data public. Last year, the Royal Society in London said in its report that scientists need to "shift away from a research culture where data is viewed as a private preserve". Funding agencies note that data paid for with public money should be public information, and the scientific "community is recognizing that data can now be shared digitally in ways that were not possible before. To match the growing demand, services are springing up to make it easier to publish research products online and enable other researchers to discover and cite them.
    Although calls to share data often concentrate on the moral advantages of sharing, the practice is not purely altruistic (利他的). Researchers who share get plenty of personal benefits, including more connections with colleagues, improved visibility and increased citations. The most successful sharers— those whose data are downloaded and cited the most often—get noticed, and their work gets used. For example, one of the most popular data sets on multidisciplinary repository Dryad is about wood density around the world; it has been downloaded 5,700 times. Co-author Amy Zanne thinks that users probably range from climate-change researchers wanting to estimate how much carbon is stored in biomass, to foresters looking for information on different grades of timber. "I’d much prefer to have my data used by the maximum number of people to ask their own questions," she says. "It’s important to allow readers and reviewers to see exactly how you arrive at your results. Publishing data and code allows your science to be reproducible. "
    Even people whose data are less popular can benefit. By making the effort to organize and label files so others can understand them, scientists become more organized and better disciplined themselves, thus avoiding confusion later on.  [br] Dryad serves as an example to show how open data sharing ______.
选项 A、is becoming increasingly popular
B、benefits sharers and users alike
C、makes researchers successful
D、saves both money and labor
答案 B
解析 推理题。第四段指出，世界上关于木材密度的多学科存储库Dryad是最受欢迎的数据库之一；它已经被下载了5700次。合著者Amy Zanne认为用户范围可能从那些想要评估生物量里储存了多少碳元素的研究者，延伸到想要寻找不同等级的木材信息的林业工作者。发布数据和代码使得你的科学研究变得具有生命力。由此可知，Dryad的例子说明开放数据共享不仅对普通用户有利，也对共享者本人有利。B项与原文相符，故答案为B。A、D项原文均未提及，故排除。C项概括片面，开放数据不仅仅能使研究人员成功，还能使用户获利，故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3529074.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)