首页
登录
职称英语
In junior high school, one of my classmates had a TV addiction—back before i
In junior high school, one of my classmates had a TV addiction—back before i
游客
2024-03-06
26
管理
问题
In junior high school, one of my classmates had a TV addiction—back before it was normal. This boy— we’ll call him Ethan—was
an encyclopedia
(百科全书) of meaningless content, from "The A-Team" to "Who’s the Boss?". Then one day Ethan’s mother made him a bold offer. If he could go a full month without watching any TV, she would give him $200. None of us thought he could do it. But Ethan quit TV, just like that. His friends offered to let him cheat at their houses on Friday nights. Ethan said no. One month later, Ethan’s mom paid him $200. He went out and bought a TV, the biggest one he could find.
Since there have been children, there have been adults trying to get them to cooperate. The Bible repeatedly commands children to heed their parents and proposes that disobedient children be stoned to death or at least have their eyes picked out by birds. Over the centuries, the stick has lost favor, in most cases, to the carrot. Today the tiny bribes (贿赂)—a sticker for using the toilet or a cookie for sitting still in church—start before kids can speak in full sentences.
In recent years, hundreds of schools have made these transactions more businesslike, experimenting with paying kids with cold, hard cash for showing up or getting good grades. I have not met a child who does not admire this trend. But it makes adults profoundly uncomfortable. Teachers complain that we are rewarding kids for doing what they should be doing of their own will. Psychologists warn that money can actually make kids perform worse by cheapening the act of learning. Parents predict widespread
slacking
after the incentives go away. The debate has become a battle for the larger war over why our kids are not learning at the rate they should be despite decades of reforms and budget increases.
But all this time, there has been only one real question, particularly in America’s lowest-performing schools-. Does it work? To find out, a Harvard economist did something education researchers almost never do: He ran a randomized experiment in hundreds of classrooms in multiple cities. He used mostly private money to pay 18000 kids a total of $6. 3 million and brought in a team of researchers to help him analyze the effects. The result is that money is not enough. But for some kids, it may be part of the solution. In the end, we all want our children to grow into self-motivated adults. The question is, how do we help them get there? [br] What does the word "slacking" (Line 5, Para. 3) mean?
选项
A、Being lazy in study.
B、Cheating.
C、Making an effort in study.
D、Complaining.
答案
A
解析
由题干中的“slacking”定位到第三段倒数第二句。语义理解题。第三段主要讨论给孩子物质奖励对孩子学习表现的负面影响,由此推测slacking含有贬义色彩。定位句意为:家长们预言,一旦奖励消失,将会出现大范围的________。结合句意可知,A“学习偷懒”为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3511546.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Alexandra,wheredidyouworkbefore?W:Iworkedatanairpor
[originaltext]M:Alexandra,wheredidyouworkbefore?W:Iworkedatanairpor
[originaltext]M:Alexandra,wheredidyouworkbefore?W:Iworkedatanairpor
[originaltext]Whenitcomestosuccessintheschoolenvironment,whatare
[originaltext]MostschoolsintheUnitedStatesreceivemoneyfromfederal
TheorganizationbehindtheLawSchoolAdmissionTestreportedthatthenumb
TheorganizationbehindtheLawSchoolAdmissionTestreportedthatthenumb
TheorganizationbehindtheLawSchoolAdmissionTestreportedthatthenumb
Injuniorhighschool,oneofmyclassmateshadaTVaddiction—backbeforei
Injuniorhighschool,oneofmyclassmateshadaTVaddiction—backbeforei
随机试题
在对流传热过程中随着流体黏度的增大,其对对流传热过程的影响的正确说法为( )。
1岁2个月男孩。高热,体温39~40℃,频咳、喘憋5天住院。查体:精神弱,面色苍
依据《实验室资质认定评审准则》要求,当实验室业务量较大无法完成时,可分包给符合要
关于基金的分类,以下说法错误的是()A.基金资产80%以上投资于货币市场工具的为
胃癌淋巴转移好发于A.左腋窝下淋巴结 B.左锁骨上淋巴结 C.脐周淋巴结
属于长期医嘱的是( )。A.地塞米松5mgivqd B.奎尼丁0.2g
A.(1,2) B.(1,0.5) C.(2,0.5) D.(2,1)
简述现代企业人力资源管理各个历史发展阶段的特点。
股息率可调整优先股票的股息率的调整一般随()的变化作调整。 A.公司经营状
下列属于外汇掉期和货币互换的区别的是()。A.外汇掉期一般为1年以内的交易,也
最新回复
(
0
)