首页
登录
职称英语
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts (催化
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts (催化
游客
2024-02-20
18
管理
问题
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts (催化剂), helping their owners forge intimate, long-term relationships with other people. But does that apply in the workplace? Christopher Honts and his colleagues at Central Michigan University were surprised to find that there was not much research on this question, and decided to put that right. They wondered in particular if the mere presence of a dog in the office might make people collaborate more effectively. And, they found that it could.
To reach this conclusion, they carried out two experiments. In the first, they brought together 12 groups of four individuals and told each group to come up with a 15-second advertisement for a made-up product. Everyone was asked to contribute ideas for the ad, but ultimately the group had to decide on only one. Some of the groups had a dog underfoot throughout, while the others had none. After the task, all the volunteers had to answer a questionnaire on how they felt about working with the other human members of the team. Mr. Honts found that those who had had a dog ranked their teammates more highly on measures of trust, team cohesion and intimacy than those who had not.
In the other experiment, the researchers explored how the presence of an animal altered players’ behaviour in a game known as the prisoner’s dilemma. In this game played by the volunteers, all four members of each group had been "charged" with a crime. Individually, they could choose (without being able to talk to the others) either to snitch (告发) on their teammates or to stand by them. Each individual’s decision affected the outcomes for the other three as well as for himself in a way that was explained in advance. The lightest sentence would be given to someone who chose to snitch while the other three did not; the heaviest penalty would be borne by a lone non-snitch. The second-best outcome came when all four decided not to snitch. And so on. Having a dog around made volunteers 30% less likely to snitch than those who played without one. The moral, then: more dogs in offices and fewer in police stations. [br] What is the result of the first experiment?
选项
A、They found the task is a challenge.
B、They came up with the advertisement in the end.
C、The team with dogs ranked their teammates low.
D、The team with dogs are more intimate and cohesive.
答案
D
解析
推理判断题。本题问的是第一个实验的结果。定位句中提到,有小狗陪伴的组员往往在信任度、团队凝聚力和亲密度方面给自己的队友评分较高,故答案为D)“有小狗陪伴的团队更为亲密团结”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3467552.html
相关试题推荐
Drunkendriving,sometimescalledAmerica’ssociallyacceptedformofmurder
Drunkendriving,sometimescalledAmerica’ssociallyacceptedformofmurder
Drunkendriving,sometimescalledAmerica’ssociallyacceptedformofmurder
[originaltext]W:Ihaveplentyofgoodideas,ProfessorJohnson,buthaven’tbe
[originaltext]W:Ihaveplentyofgoodideas,ProfessorJohnson,buthaven’tbe
[originaltext]W:Ihaveplentyofgoodideas,ProfessorJohnson,buthaven’tbe
[originaltext]W:Ihaveplentyofgoodideas,ProfessorJohnson,buthaven’tbe
[originaltext]W:Ihaveplentyofgoodideas,ProfessorJohnson,buthaven’tbe
[originaltext]W:Ihaveplentyofgoodideas,ProfessorJohnson,buthaven’tbe
One’ssocialstatushasbeen____________(被比做是他的标签).comparedtohislabel
随机试题
It’sperhapstheworld’smostfamousunderwaterattraction,immortalizedin
[originaltext]Wouldyoulikesomemorerice?[/originaltext]A、Ilikericebest.
Organicfarmershadfoughttopreventgenetically-engineeredcropsfrombein
射频识别系统通常由()组成。A.电子标签 B.阅读器 C.感应系统 D.
按照现行规定,生产工人根据国家法律、法规和政策规定执行国家或社会义务等原因按计时
A.病原体潜藏在组织中 B.病原体未引起组织损伤但引起免疫反应 C.病原体引
古诗云:“私家无钱炉,平地无铜山,胡为秋夏税,岁岁输铜钱。”该诗所指的赋税制度是
患儿,1岁。发热1天,全身见散在细小淡红色皮疹,喷嚏,流涕,偶有咳嗽,精神不振,
乌头中毒的主要临床表现为A.恶心呕吐、腹痛腹泻、口中有金属味、流涎、口腔黏膜充血
下列各类挡土墙,属于柔性结构物的是()。A.加筋土挡土墙 B.衡重式挡土墙
最新回复
(
0
)