首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
77
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463612.html
相关试题推荐
Forthisproblem,ourteacher’sideaisthat______(那个计划应该立即执行)theplan(should)be
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
对于随机变量X1,X2,…,Xn,下列说法不正确的是().
甲将一部手机丢失,乙拣到后,委托经营手机旧货交易的朋友在旧货市场上出售,丙买下该
下列关于流动比率的说法,正确的是()。A.流动资产是指具有即时支付能力的资产
共用题干 LookAfterYourVoiceOftenspeaker
共用题干 SchoolLunchResearchhasshowntha
2017年上半年,全国居民人均可支配收入12932元,比上年同期名义增长8.8%
下边四个图形中,只有一个是由上边的四个图形拼合(只能通过上、下、左、右平移)而成
下列关于薄膜覆盖养护的说法,正确的是( )。A.混合料摊铺碾压成型后,可覆盖薄膜
在排风系统中,利用生产过程或设备本身产生的气流,诱导有害物随气流进入罩内的排风罩
毒物代谢的两重性是指A.一相反应可以降低毒性,二相反应可以增加毒性 B.经代谢
最新回复
(
0
)