首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
37
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463612.html
相关试题推荐
Forthisproblem,ourteacher’sideaisthat______(那个计划应该立即执行)theplan(should)be
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
[originaltext]Aseveryschoolboyknows,themostimportantrawmaterialsof
Tahaadmitsthathisgovernmenthas______awelcomingprayermatforavarietyof
ForgetMaryPoppins—aninetiesnanny(保姆)ismorelikelytoresembleMartinSm
Mostparentsandteachersdonotlikeyoungpeopletoreadcomicbooks(连环画册)
《建设工程安全生产管理条例》中所称建设工程,是指()。A.土木工程 B.
老年男性患者,水肿10年,反复发作,下肢肿甚,腰膝酸软,畏寒肢冷,呼吸急促,张口
计划工作的重要性不包括A.有利于减少工作中的失误 B.有利于明确工作目标 C
某通信市场原有五家电信运营商,通过兼并重组合并为三家运营商。2006年、2007
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
干砌片石护坡应该( ),厚度均匀。A.自下而上逐排砌筑 B.自上而下随挖随砌
最新回复
(
0
)