首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
36
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The teaching in the university would really be improved if ______.
选项
A、such Worst Teacher Award had not been organized
B、the election results had not been publicized so extensively
C、a thorough discussion and survey had been conducted to evaluate the teaching
D、more details of the reasons for voting had been given
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463611.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]AmotherinTamilNadu,India,recentlyhadaquestionforou
Ifyouexplainedyoursituationtoteacher,he______(能给你更好的建议).wouldbeablet0
Teacher’snotesgivepractical______ondevelopingreadingskills,togetherwith
Agoodteachermustknowhowto______hisideastothestudents,asgenerallya
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Alltheteachers______themselvestoimprovethequalityofeducation.A、giveof
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Aprimaryschoolteachercannottakeitforgrantedthathispupilsalwaysdot
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Parents’Homework:FindPerfectTeachersforKidsTomiHall
随机试题
Onesummernight,onmywayhomefromworkIdecidedtoseeamovie.Iknew
Drivinghaslongbeenthoughtofas(efficient)______thanflying,butaccording
[originaltext]Jetlag,causedbytravelingbetweentimezones,isbecoming
OnAdversity1.每个人都会碰到逆境2.人们对逆境的看法不同3.我的看法OnAdver
AdetailedandthoroughresearchprojectundertakenbytheOpenUniversityr
教师赵某违反学校管理制度,被校长在全校师生会上点名批评,赵某的丈夫王某听后,不辨
施工合同索赔的依据主要有()。A、合同文件 B、法律、法规 C、工程建设惯例
某大型商场地下二层,每层建筑面积为7000m2,地下二层室内地面与室外出入口地坪
下列关于贷款发放的具体流程,错误的是()。A.借款人委托贷款银行代办的,贷款银
下列各项中,属于项目董事会的职权的是( )。A.编制项目财务预算.决策 B.编
最新回复
(
0
)