首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
28
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The election didn’t have representativeness because ______.
选项
A、the results of the election were hardly persuasive
B、only a small percentage of students participated in the election
C、the election was not organized in a constructive way
D、the teachers involved are not given details of the reasons for voting
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463610.html
相关试题推荐
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、Tofindtheinformationinthelibrary.B、Toborrowthebooksfromherteacher
Becausetimeinclassislimited,theteacherexplainedthequestion______.A、in
Allofusdidquiteagoodjobbuttheteacheronly______himoutforpraise.A、
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Aprimaryschoolteachercannottakeitforgrantedthathispupilsalwaysdot
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
随机试题
ThedevelopmentandwidespreaduseofcomputertechnologyandtheInterneth
Thathealthandbeautyarelinkedisnotindoubt.Butitcomesassomething
在生成树协议(STP)中,收敛的定义是指( )。A.所有端口都转换到阻塞状态
某公司申请不动产测绘专业和互联网地图服务专业甲级资质,对该公司技术人员数量的计算
抑制DNA合成的抗菌药是A、青霉素类 B、喹诺酮类 C、多黏菌素类 D、氨
2018年4月中国手机产量达14366.7万台,同比增长2.8%;2018年1-
奥苏伯尔根据学习材料与学习者原有知识结构的关系把学习分为()。A.知识学习和技
《机电产品国际招标机构资格审定办法》规定,负责从事利用国外贷款和国内资金进行国际
信托财产管理中。信托财产事实上的处分是指()。A.对信托财产设立抵押 B
(2015年真题)根据《工伤保险条例》,可以认定为工伤或者视同工伤的有()A.
最新回复
(
0
)