首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
32
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The election didn’t have representativeness because ______.
选项
A、the results of the election were hardly persuasive
B、only a small percentage of students participated in the election
C、the election was not organized in a constructive way
D、the teachers involved are not given details of the reasons for voting
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463610.html
相关试题推荐
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、Tofindtheinformationinthelibrary.B、Toborrowthebooksfromherteacher
Becausetimeinclassislimited,theteacherexplainedthequestion______.A、in
Allofusdidquiteagoodjobbuttheteacheronly______himoutforpraise.A、
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Aprimaryschoolteachercannottakeitforgrantedthathispupilsalwaysdot
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
随机试题
【S1】[br]【S4】asthat改为asthoseasseriouslyendangeredas后面的比较对象应当是resources,是复数
Theteachernoticedsome(improve)______inmyspeechafterIhadpracticed.imp
[originaltext]WeknowthenthatintheUS,it’sthejobofCongresstopro
桂林是中国著名的风景旅游城市。它位于广西东北部,面积有2.78万平方公里,人口500万。拥有2000多年历史的桂林还是一个历史文化名城。自北宋(the
A.连续且取得极大值 B.连续且取得极小值 C.可导且导数为零 D.可导且
线性表的每个结点只能是一个简单类型,而链表的每个结点可以是一个复杂类型。()
关于相对危险度描述正确的是()A.相对危险度可用于描述单个危险因素或多个
《意见》中到2020年,境内旅游总消费额达到了5.5亿元,城乡居民平均每年出游4
简述教育对文化发展的促进作用。
互联网基金销售业务由()负责监管。A.证监会 B.银监会 C.国务院
最新回复
(
0
)