首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
3
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The election didn’t have representativeness because ______.
选项
A、the results of the election were hardly persuasive
B、only a small percentage of students participated in the election
C、the election was not organized in a constructive way
D、the teachers involved are not given details of the reasons for voting
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463610.html
相关试题推荐
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、Tofindtheinformationinthelibrary.B、Toborrowthebooksfromherteacher
Becausetimeinclassislimited,theteacherexplainedthequestion______.A、in
Allofusdidquiteagoodjobbuttheteacheronly______himoutforpraise.A、
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Aprimaryschoolteachercannottakeitforgrantedthathispupilsalwaysdot
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
随机试题
快速排序算法在排序过程中,在待排序数组中确定一个元素为基准元素,根据基准元素把待
在信息系统建设中,建设方与承建方的合同可用于()。①作为监理工作的基本依据
营业收入在40000万元及以上的工业企业为大型企业。( )
男孩,8岁。咳嗽10d,近4d加重,呈阵发性连声剧咳,每次发作持续十余分钟,咳时
根据我国现在通行的幼儿心理发展阶段的划分,l3岁幼儿属于( )。A.新生儿期
在中学阶段有多种形式的考试,如检测学生是否达到毕业水平的学业水平考试,普通高等学
阻塞性黄疸时,尿中尿胆原A.阴性B.正常C.增加D.减少E.不定
有4个独立的投资方案,寿命期为75年,费用资料见表,设基金的利率为4%,利用效益
案例: 李丽住在北京的老城区,从小身患残疾,据她讲父母将她扔给保姆后基本不闻不
下列关于试算平衡法的表述中,不正确的是()。A、包括发生额试算平衡法和余额试算平
最新回复
(
0
)