首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
45
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The election didn’t have representativeness because ______.
选项
A、the results of the election were hardly persuasive
B、only a small percentage of students participated in the election
C、the election was not organized in a constructive way
D、the teachers involved are not given details of the reasons for voting
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463610.html
相关试题推荐
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、Tofindtheinformationinthelibrary.B、Toborrowthebooksfromherteacher
Becausetimeinclassislimited,theteacherexplainedthequestion______.A、in
Allofusdidquiteagoodjobbuttheteacheronly______himoutforpraise.A、
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Aprimaryschoolteachercannottakeitforgrantedthathispupilsalwaysdot
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
随机试题
SectionsoftheminutesoftheJunemeetingdonotseemtomake______inlightof
Mainstreampro-marketeconomistsallagreethatcompetitionisan______spurto
IPSAN区别于FCSAN以及IBSAN的主要技术是采用( )实现异地
写字楼首层层高4.0m,二层以上层高均为3.0m,建筑物共8层,该建筑属(
一男性病人行左侧腮腺浅叶+肿物切除术+面神经解剖术,术中结扎腮腺导管,应选择的绷
肠梗阻的四大共同表现是A.便闭、腹痛、肠音减弱、腹胀 B.腹痛、呕吐、腹胀、便
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
关于终身教育,以下说法不正确的是A.终身教育是学习化社会的基本特征 B.终身教
下列项目必须进行劳动安全卫生预评价的有()。A.新建、扩建和改建项目 B.火
肋柱式锚杆挡土墙可根据地形采用单级或多级,每级墙高度不宜大于8m,具体高度可视地
最新回复
(
0
)