首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
29
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The phrase "to get their own back on the teachers" (Line 2, Para. 3) most probably means that the students would ______.
选项
A、have their revenge on the teachers
B、be at their teachers’ back
C、assess their teachers back to back
D、turn their back on the teachers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463608.html
相关试题推荐
Ifyouexplainedyoursituationtoteacher,he______(能给你更好的建议).wouldbeablet0
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、TaughtherEnglishherself.B、Wenttotalkwithherteacher.C、Signedupfora
Somepeople______avoidquestionsofrightorwrongandremainneutralaboutth
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
Parents’Homework:FindPerfectTeachersforKidsTomiHall
随机试题
[img]2021m8x/ct_ve01003002m_ehbreadf_0565_210831[/img][br]Whichorganizationi
It’sdifficulttoimaginetheseaeverrunningoutoffish.It’ssovast,so
施工质量保证工作是( )的行为。A.发包人 B.承包人 B.监理人 D.
某次数学竞赛准备22支铅笔作为奖品发给获得一、二、三等奖的学生,原计划一等奖每人
建设工程合同包括:()A.工程设计、监理、施工合同 B.工程勘察、设计、监
关于分项工程实测项目检验的相关规定中,表述不正确的是()。A.外观质量和质量保
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
下列属于和银行往来异常现象的是()。A.经营性现金流量持续为负值 B.将回笼
执业药师的执业行为规范不得有A.以贬低同行的专业能力和水平等方式招揽业务 B.
关于购买性支出和转移性支出对经济影响的说法,正确的是()A.购买性支出直接影响
最新回复
(
0
)