首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
48
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The phrase "to get their own back on the teachers" (Line 2, Para. 3) most probably means that the students would ______.
选项
A、have their revenge on the teachers
B、be at their teachers’ back
C、assess their teachers back to back
D、turn their back on the teachers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463608.html
相关试题推荐
Ifyouexplainedyoursituationtoteacher,he______(能给你更好的建议).wouldbeablet0
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、TaughtherEnglishherself.B、Wenttotalkwithherteacher.C、Signedupfora
Somepeople______avoidquestionsofrightorwrongandremainneutralaboutth
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
Parents’Homework:FindPerfectTeachersforKidsTomiHall
随机试题
Highstreetshopsuseavarietyofmeanstoattractshoppers,suchasstriki
Recentlymoreandmoreattentionhasbeenfocusedtotheproblemofpr
Lastweek,speakersataprograminWashingtondiscussedusingnanotechnolog
Amulticastroutermayreceivethousands
将多个目标代码文件装配成一个可执行程序的程序称为( )A.编译器 B.解释器
不符合早期食管癌的描述是A.癌的直径小于2.0cm B.浸润深度不超过黏膜下层
义务教育阶段的美术课程被分成了几大领域()。A.4 B.3 C.6 D.
质量是一组固有特性满足要求的程度。理解质量的定义时,下列说法正确的是()。[
一般资料:求助者,女性,33岁,机关公务员。 案例介绍:求助者一年前在家里做饭
桥涵过渡段填筑施工时,应选择良好填料,采用合适压实机械进行()碾压。A.重型
最新回复
(
0
)