首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
43
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The phrase "to get their own back on the teachers" (Line 2, Para. 3) most probably means that the students would ______.
选项
A、have their revenge on the teachers
B、be at their teachers’ back
C、assess their teachers back to back
D、turn their back on the teachers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463608.html
相关试题推荐
Ifyouexplainedyoursituationtoteacher,he______(能给你更好的建议).wouldbeablet0
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、TaughtherEnglishherself.B、Wenttotalkwithherteacher.C、Signedupfora
Somepeople______avoidquestionsofrightorwrongandremainneutralaboutth
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
Parents’Homework:FindPerfectTeachersforKidsTomiHall
随机试题
[originaltext]Whenyouliveinanapartmentbuilding,whereonlywallsepar
某公司计划建立一套ERP系统,在一家建设单位协助下开始招标工作。在以下招标过程中
目前银行客户通过银行营业网点购买的国债不包括()。A.记账式国债 B.凭证
A.双瞳孔缩小 B.瞳孔反射消失 C.双瞳孔不等大 D.双瞳孔散大 E.
对列入国家医保的药品价格实行A.市场调节价 B.地域调节价 C.企业自定价
下面四个图形中,只有一个是由上面的四个图形拼合(只能通过上、下、左、右平移)而成
以下哪个解剖结构不位于下颌骨体部外侧面A.颏棘 B.颏孔 C.正中联合 D
北京市A企业,与上海市的B企业有业务往来。一天,A通过邮局将一份重要邮件寄给B,
以下不属于假设开发法估价一般步骤的是()。A:调查了解待开发房地产的状况 B:
金融创新中,最高层次的创新是()。A、原始创新 B、吸纳创新 C、组合创
最新回复
(
0
)