The American Revolution was not a revolution in the sense of a radical or total

游客2024-02-18  13

问题 The American Revolution was not a revolution in the sense of a radical or total change. It was not a sudden and【S1】overturning of the political and social framework, such as later occurred in France and Russia,【S2】both were already independent nations. Significant changes were ushered in,【S3】they were not breathtaking. What happened was accelerated【S4】rather than outright revolution. During the conflict, people went on working and praying, marrying and playing. Most of them were not【S5】disturbed by the actual fighting, and many of the more isolated communities scarcely knew that a war was on.
America’s War of Independence heralded the birth of three modem nations. One was Canada, which【S6】its first large influx of English-speaking population from the thousands of loyalists who fled there from the United States;【S7】was Australia, which became a penal colony now that America was no longer【S8】for prisoners and debtors; the third newcomer—the United States — based itself squarely on republican principles.
Yet even the political overturn was not so【S9】as one might suppose. In some states, notably Connecticut and Rhode Island, the war largely ratified a colonial self-rule already existing. British officials, everywhere ousted, were【S10】by a home-grown governing class, which promptly sought a local substitute for king and parliament.
A)violent                             I)other
B)seriously                           J)received
C)revolutionary                       K)but
D)evolution                           L)severe
E)another                             M)available
F)and                                 N)when
G)replaced                            O)revolution
H)repelled

选项

答案 A

解析 根据本句语法结构提示选择形容词。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3460165.html
最新回复(0)