首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2024-02-17
32
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] Susan Aspey looks at the funding by the government with______.
选项
A、criticism
B、consent
C、indifference
D、expectation
答案
B
解析
观点态度题。本题考查文章人物的观点。苏珊·阿斯贝的观点态度只能从第5段推断出,从这一段中的defended和record amount of funding可知她对教育部的拨款数是认同的。选项A和C都是贬义词.不可能表达她的观点;选项D虽是褒义词,但苏珊是在陈述已发生的事实,而不是发表对教育部的期望。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3459497.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Nate:HeyPhil.HaveyoueverbeentoaJapanesepublicbath?Ih
______(没有一项发明获得如此多的表扬和批评)thanInternet.Noinventionhasreceivedmorepraiseand
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
随机试题
Undauntedbythescaleofthejob,Lesley______planninghoweachroomshouldloo
Therewerestillsomeminorgrammarmistakes,but_________thecompositionwasr
Whycan’tPeterrelaxoverthethree-weekvacation?[originaltext]Crystal HiPe
BenbecameinterestedinMongoliaearlyinlife.Whenhewas9yearsold,he
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
截至2020年7月,城镇消费品零售额约是乡村的多少倍?A.6.07 B.5
进行成本费用预测依据的原则不包括( )。 A.惯性原则 B.弹性原则
长时间卧床者突然站起时感头昏,眼前发黑的主要原因是( )。A.循环血量减少
胆囊结石反复发作急性胆囊炎,B超胆总管直径6mm,口服胆囊造影检查胆囊不显影,
研究人员将某种植物乳酸菌混入实验鼠的饲料,在实验鼠食用这种饲料4周后,又持续两周
最新回复
(
0
)