首页
登录
职称英语
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
游客
2024-02-16
26
管理
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse than the hazards of smoking mo many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer—alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down—abolished by an amendment to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20,1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunken-ness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink—or two or three. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Drinkers were lucky to know of an illegal bar that served Mexican or Canadian liquor. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever—often poisoned alcohol.
On December 5,1933, they repealed prohibition by ratifying the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. [br] During Prohibition, people ______.
选项
A、lived in fear of the law
B、were willing to risk arrest for the pleasure of liquor
C、recklessly endangered their communities
D、were respectful of the legal sanctions placed on them
答案
B
解析
事实细节题。第三段第二行“They were willing to take risks to get it”,即说明此点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3454957.html
相关试题推荐
Itisthe______ofthepolicetopreventanddetectcrimeandofthelawcourts
【B1】[br]【B19】A、preventB、forbidC、banD、block?Aprevent...fromhappening防止……发生
【B1】[br]【B17】A、preventingB、withstandingC、sustainingD、overcomingD固定搭配题。这句的意
【B1】[br]【B11】A、enableB、stimulateC、advocateD、preventA固定搭配题。句意见71题。空格处填入的谓语动
【B1】[br]【B8】A、preventB、requireC、assistD、forbidC语义衔接题。这句的意思是“大多数学校开设了帮助新生培养
【B1】[br]【B3】A、keepB、preventC、protestD、cutB本题测试动词词义辨析。四个选项的意思分别是:keep表示保持,保
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
随机试题
[img]ct_epem_epelisv_01051(20097)[/img][br][originaltext]F:Isawasawsawin
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrueaboutHarbinaccordingtothespea
扑救C类火灾,应选用()型灭火器。A.干粉 B.洁净气体 C.水雾 D.
对于偶然组合,要求( )。A.只考虑永久荷载与偶然作用的组合 B.偶然作用不
通过坍落度试验,当混凝土试件的一侧发生崩坍或一边剪切破坏,应记录。
甲公司于2006年1月2日购入乙公司于1月1日发行的公司债券
A.隐白 B.太白 C.血海 D.阴陵泉 E.公孙善治水肿、小便不利或失
财产性收入一般是指家庭拥有的动产(银行存款、有价证券)、不动产(房屋、土地、收藏
下列说法错误的是(____)。(A)变压器冷却系统应配置两个相互独立的电源,并具
脐带过长是指脐带长度超过多少A.50cm B.70cm C.80cm D.
最新回复
(
0
)