首页
登录
职称英语
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, th
游客
2024-02-16
12
管理
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse than the hazards of smoking mo many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer—alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down—abolished by an amendment to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20,1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunken-ness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink—or two or three. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Drinkers were lucky to know of an illegal bar that served Mexican or Canadian liquor. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever—often poisoned alcohol.
On December 5,1933, they repealed prohibition by ratifying the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. [br] Which of the following was NOT a characteristic reason for the proposal of the 18th Amendment to the Constitution and the Volstead Act?
选项
A、There would be no further danger to the public from alcoholism.
B、There would be a rise in the cost of alcoholic beverages.
C、Without liquor, people would not drink.
D、People would not become drunk or create a public nuisance.
答案
B
解析
综合判断题。第二段讲及提出“the Amendment to the Constitution and the Volstead Act”的原因,涉及A、C、D三项所述的内容,而B项内容则是此修正案实施后可能引起的结果。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3454955.html
相关试题推荐
【B1】[br]【B19】A、preventB、forbidC、banD、block?Aprevent...fromhappening防止……发生
【B1】[br]【B11】A、enableB、stimulateC、advocateD、preventA固定搭配题。句意见71题。空格处填入的谓语动
[originaltext]Everywherewelook,weseeAmericansrunning.Theyrunforev
Thegovernment__________(已采取一系列措施)topreventtheriverkurufloodinginsummer.
He____________(一定是在竞争幸存下来),forhiscompanyisstillrunningnormally.musthav
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
Peoplearealwayscomingupwithnewrulesforrunningasuccessfulbusiness
随机试题
Americanhighereducationstandsonthebrinkofchaos.Neverhavesomany
[originaltext]M:Howareyournewneighbors?W:Theyarewonderfulpeople.Iam
Heexplainedthathisdietwassostrictthathehadto______himselfoccasiona
Phil_______forecastabigincreaseinsales,andheturnedouttoberight.A、c
根据项目干系人权利/利益的分类,针对项目有重大影响,同时项目执行对其有明显利益关
A.药物性闭经 B.卵巢性闭经 C.垂体性闭经 D.子宫性闭经 E.下丘
当胎儿后肩入盆时,将后肩向侧上旋转,协助胎头同方向旋转,当后肩旋转至前肩位置时娩
Q=ηV/T公式中一般取η为()。A、3-6 B、4-6 C、3-5 D、
根据物权法律制度的规定,下列各项中,属于物权法律制度上的物的是()。A.太阳
正确选用劳动防护用品是保证企业员工劳动过程中安全和健康的重要措施之一。企业选用劳
最新回复
(
0
)