首页
登录
职称英语
Rocket RenaissanceThe Ear of Private Spaceflight
Rocket RenaissanceThe Ear of Private Spaceflight
游客
2024-02-12
22
管理
问题
Rocket Renaissance
The Ear of Private Spaceflight Is About to Start
Background
Two years ago, people witnessed the first space travel by SpaceShip One. Three people were involved in this flight: Burt Rutan, who designed the craft, and Mike Melvill, who flew it--although they were ably assisted by Paul Allen, one of the founders of Microsoft, who paid for it. Certainly, people have long been known that manned spaceflight was possible. What they showed was that it is not just a game for governments. Private individuals can play, too.
People involved
Now, lots of people want to join in, and most of them have just met up at the International Space Development Conference in Los Angeles, to engage in that mixture of camaraderie and competition that characterises the beginnings of a new technology. And, as might be expected, they have two of the necessary ingredients of success: ideas and money.
First, the money. So far, more than $1 billion is known to have been committed to building private spaceships and the infrastructure to support them. For example, Mr.. Rum’ s follow-up vehicle, SpaceShip Two, is expected to cost its backers, Virgin Galactic, $240m for a fleet of five. The spaceport in New Mexico from which these are intended to fly will account for another $225m, although New Mexico’s government is planning to raise this money itself.
These are not small sums, of course. On the other hand, Virgin Galactic has already banked $14m of deposits towards the $200,000 fare from people who want to travel on SpaceShip Two, even though it has yet to be built, let alone flown.
All this suggests that spaceflight, if not exactly entering the age of the common man, is at least entering the age of the moderately prosperous enthusiast. For entrepreneurs, it is no longer necessary to have billions of dollars to get into space; millions will now do. And for those who merely wish to travel there, and have enough money in their bank account, reality is favourable.
Get started
As with aircraft a century ago, a lot of designs are competing with each other, and there is no certainty about which will succeed. The initial goal is to build a "suborbital" vehicle. This will not have to develop the tremendous speed needed to go into orbit around the Earth. instead, it will travel briefly into space, offering a short thrilling ride out of the atmosphere, a few minutes of weightlessness, and a spectacular view of the planet from about 100kin. Four important criteria are how you take off, what fuel you use, what your craft is made of, and how you come back.
Most people’s vision of a rocket launch is straight up from the ground. But, of the five vehicles most likely to be developed, two will actually be launched from the air. SpaceShip Two will be carded to high altitude by a purpose-built aircraft known as Eve before its rocket motor is ignited. And Explorer, a vehicle being designed by Space Adventures, will be launched from the top of a high-altitude Russian research plane called the M-55X, according to Eric Anderson, the firm’s president and chief executive.
As Dennis Jenkins, a consultant engineer at NASA, America’s space agency, points out, this is similar to using a two-stage rocket to get into space, with the aircraft acting as the first stage. However, a plane offers several advantages over a throw-away booster rocket. First, it can be used again. Second, it uses oxygen from the air, rather than having to carry its own oxidant, which saves weight. Third, it is lifted by wings. That means the atmosphere is an advantage, rather than a hindrance. All this means that the spacecraft itself can be lighter and cheaper.
Not everyone wants to run two vehicles, though. Jeff Greason, president of XCOR Aerospace, a firm based in Mojave, California, is developing a two-person, ground-launched suborbital rocketplane called Xerus. Launching from the ground, says Mr. Greason, is more difficult than air launching, but he reckons that in this case it has significantly lower operating costs.
Fuel choices
The second important design choice is the type of fuel. Unlike a jet engine, a rocket carries its own oxidant (氧第剂). This is why it can operate in space. Sometimes that oxidant is oxygen itself, in liquid form. In that case the fuel, too, is usually liquid-either kerosene (煤油) or liquid hydrogen (氢) —and the two liquids are stored in separate tanks until they meet in the rocket’s combustion chamber. Alternatively, both fuel and oxidant are solid, and are loaded pre-mixed, like the propellant of a firework rocket.
SpaceShip Two, though, follows the design of SpaceShip One and is powered by a mixture of the two. The combustion chamber of a mixture is partly filled with solid fuel but no oxidant. However, the fuel is coated round the inside of the chamber, leaving a hole through the middle into which a liquid or gaseous oxidant can be pumped, and out of which the exhaust emerges. In SpaceShip One, the fuel was rubber and the oxidant a liquefied gas called nitrous oxide (一氧化二氮).
Proponents of mixture say they are safer than either pure solid or pure liquid rockets. George Whittinghill, Virgin Galactic’s chief technologist, says that they are safer than solid rockets because the flow of oxidant can be controlled, and combustion halted, if there is a problem. Solid rockets, like the fireworks they resemble, cannot be stopped until they run out of fuel. On the other hand liquid-fuelled engines, though they can be shut down, are complex and temperamental. As Mr. Whittinghill observes, "they have pumps, seals, valves and lines everywhere, and there is a lot that potentially could go wrong."
All this rather irrates those working on liquid propulsion. Richard Pournelle, head of investor relations at XCOR Aerospace, says the comparison is unfair. Liquid propulsion is routine in rocketry while hybrids are still rare. Numbers alone, therefore, mean that liquid-fuelled rockets blow up more often. That, Mr. Pournelle argues, does not prove that they are inherently unsafe. Chuck Lauer, vice- president of business development for Rocketplane, another firm going down the liquid-fuelled route, agrees and argues that kerosene is widely used as aviation fuel and nobody complains that it is unsafe. [br] Although it is possible to launch the spaceship both from ground and from the air, some people believe it’s more cost-effective to launch it from ground.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
此题是细节题,根据关键词launch定位该题涉及的信息在Get started部分的第三段的最后一句,该句明确指出:地面发射更经济
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3443264.html
相关试题推荐
Thepassageismainlyabout______.[br]Accordingtothepassage,aprivate-ent
TheAmericaneconomicsystemisorganizedaroundabasicallyprivateenterpr
WhenMikeKellyfirstsetouttobuildhisownprivatespace-ferryservice,hef
Malepilotsflyinggeneralaviation(专用航空)(private)aircraftintheUnited
Malepilotsflyinggeneralaviation(专用航空)(private)aircraftintheUnited
Malepilotsflyinggeneralaviation(专用航空)(private)aircraftintheUnited
Malepilotsflyinggeneralaviation(专用航空)(private)aircraftintheUnited
[originaltext]Formanypeople,DavyCrockettrepresentedthespiritofthe
RocketRenaissanceTheEarofPrivateSpaceflight
RocketRenaissanceTheEarofPrivateSpaceflight
随机试题
[originaltext]M:IfoundthatlivinginJarjan,peoplewerebusier.Theyseemt
反映烟煤在干馏过程中软化熔融,形成胶质体并固化黏结的能力的是()。A.煤的反
一位扭伤后腰及左腿痛2个月的病人,未经任何治疗。在当地医院CT检查显示L4~5间
(2018年真题)在期权到期日,股票价格高于行权价格,则权证持有人最可能的选择是
在肝脏受损早期即出现活性减低的凝血因子是A.FⅡ:CB.FⅤ:CC.FⅦ:CD.
下列说法不符合控制器类设备在消防控制室内布置要求的是()。A.设备面盘后的维修距
(2019年真题)对某高层公共建筑的消防设施联动控制功能进行调试。下列调试结果中
6岁儿童,右下第一恒磨牙已经完整萌出,窝沟较深,医生决定对该牙进行封闭,操作过程
(2021年真题)2X20年1月1日,甲公司取得专门借款4000万元用于当日开工
主要起改善混凝土坍落度性能作用的外加剂是()A.减水剂 B.引气剂 C.缓凝
最新回复
(
0
)