首页
登录
职称英语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announc
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announc
游客
2024-02-09
43
管理
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun. [br] What did Amazon.com announce?
选项
A、Libraries will be smaller and less crowded.
B、E-books will be sure to replace hardcover books.
C、It was not a surprise for e-books to share a larger market.
D、Sales of e-books exceeded that of traditional books.
答案
D
解析
信息明示题。定位句中含有同位语从句结构,其先行词是announcement。由此可知,同位语从句的内容就是公告的内容,即sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books。故D)“电子书的销售量超过了传统书籍的销售量”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3436432.html
相关试题推荐
RecentstudiesbytheCouncilofEuropeshowthat______.[br]Dr.Baum,arepre
[originaltext]AdisturbingreportappearedrecentlyinthemagazineScience
Judgingfromrecentsurveys,mostexpertsinsleepbehaviouragreethatther
Judgingfromrecentsurveys,mostexpertsinsleepbehaviouragreethatther
Judgingfromrecentsurveys,mostexpertsinsleepbehaviouragreethatther
Judgingfromrecentsurveys,mostexpertsinsleepbehaviouragreethatther
Methodsoftraininganimalshavechangedgreatlyinrecentyears.Zookeepersha
Methodsoftraininganimalshavechangedgreatlyinrecentyears.Zookeepersha
Methodsoftraininganimalshavechangedgreatlyinrecentyears.Zookeepersha
[originaltext]Astudyrecentlyconcludedthatthepublicinindustrialized
随机试题
Creativityisnotsomethingoneisjustbornwith,norisitnecessarilyac
2010年食物与营养发展总体目标不包括( )。A.保障合理的营养素摄人量
肝硬化腹水性质常为()A.乳糜样腹水 B.腹水比重<1.016,蛋白<20g
具有活血凉血作用的药组是A.郁金、姜黄 B.川芎、赤芍 C.郁金、丹参 D
中国药典规定凡检查溶出度的制剂,可不再进行A:崩解时限检查 B:纯度检查 C
下列关于利多卡因的描述不正确的是A:轻度阻滞钠通道 B:缩短浦肯野纤维及心室肌
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
口腔的感染源有A.潜伏期感染者 B.病毒携带者 C.急性传染病患者 D.A
某制造业企业为增值税一般纳税人,2019年至2020年发生相关经济业务
肺活量在生长发育特征中不正确的表述是A.男孩、女孩的肺活量发育特征与身高、体重不
最新回复
(
0
)