首页
登录
职称英语
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts(催化剂
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts(催化剂
游客
2024-02-08
21
管理
问题
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts(催化剂), helping their owners forge intimate, long-term relationships with other people. But does that apply to the workplace? Christopher Honts and his colleagues at Central Michigan University were surprised to find that there was not much research on this question, and decided to put that right. They wondered in particular if the mere presence of a dog in the office-might make people collaborate more effectively. And. they found that it could.
To reach this conclusion, they carried out two experiments. In the first, they brought together 12 groups of four individuals and told each group to come up with a 15-second advertisement for a made-up product.
Everyone was asked to contribute ideas for the ad, but ultimately the group had to decide on only one. Some of the groups had a dog underfoot throughout, while the others had none. After the task, all the volunteers had to answer a questionnaire on how they felt about working with the other human members of the team. Mr. Honts found that those who had had a dog ranked their teammates more highly on measures of trust, team cohesion and intimacy than those who had not.
In the other experiment, the researchers explored how the presence of an animal altered players’ behaviour in a game known as the prisoner’s dilemma. In this game played by the volunteers, all four members of each group had been "charged" with a crime. Individually, they could choose(without being able to talk to the others)either to snitch(告发)on their teammates or to stand by them. Each individual’s decision affected the outcomes for the other three as well as for himself in a way that was explained in advance. The lightest sentence would be given to someone who chose to snitch while the other three did not; the heaviest penalty would be borne by a lone non-snitch. The second-best outcome came when all four decided not to snitch. And so on. Having a dog around made volunteers 30% less likely to snitch than those who played without one. The moral. then: more dogs in offices and fewer in police stations. [br] What is the best title for the passage? ,
选项
A、Dogs Improve Office Productivity
B、Dogs Are Vital to Office Workers
C、Dogs Reduce the Crime Rate
D、Dogs Are Helpful to Human Beings
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3433485.html
相关试题推荐
SocialmediapresentschallengetouniversitiesUniversitiesh
SocialmediapresentschallengetouniversitiesUniversitiesh
SocialmediapresentschallengetouniversitiesUniversitiesh
SocialmediapresentschallengetouniversitiesUniversitiesh
Tworecentstudieshaveconfirmedthebeliefthatsizedoesmatter,atleast
Tworecentstudieshaveconfirmedthebeliefthatsizedoesmatter,atleast
Languageistheprincipalmeanswherebyweconductoursociallives.Whenit
Languageistheprincipalmeanswherebyweconductoursociallives.Whenit
Languageistheprincipalmeanswherebyweconductoursociallives.Whenit
Languageistheprincipalmeanswherebyweconductoursociallives.Whenit
随机试题
Thatanecologicalcrisisconfrontshumankindisnowsocentraltoourthink
EnthusiasmforPetsPetsarean【T1】______partofmanyBritishfamilies.
[originaltext]M:Don’tyouknowyou’respeeding?Showmeyourdriver’slicense
Whileitcannotbedeniedthatarespectableprofessionorcareerismuchmo
HowSafeIsYourCellPhone?A)Ittakesalittleextrawork
A.内痔 B.肛瘘 C.外痔 D.直肠息肉 E.直肠癌直肠指检,扪及到质
A.痰热扰心 B.脏气衰微 C.宗气大虚 D.心气虚弱 E.热扰心神语言
“道不同,不相谋”是影响人际交往的()因素 A、主观因素 B、客观因素 C、
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
引发交易异常情况的原因中,不可抗力是指证券交易所所在地或全国其他部分区域出现或据
最新回复
(
0
)