首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2024-02-02
36
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] According to Tom Fagan, ____.
选项
A、the government has done its best to finance the poor children
B、the goals of No Child Left Behind Act are difficult to realize
C、the way of measuring progress by annual tests should be changed
D、the Bush government shouldn’t have approved the Title I program
答案
B
解析
本题考查对复合句的理解。由文中第6段第1句中的harder...to meet...可知B正确。C最具干扰性,要排除这个干扰,关键是要理解第6段第1句中由which引导的非限制性定语从句的作用。这个从句是对前面“the Bush administration’s signature education program”的附加事实信息,不属于汤姆·法甘的看法。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3414821.html
相关试题推荐
Anewanalysisoffederalmoneythatpublicschoolsreceiveforlow-incomes
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerintereste
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerintereste
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerintereste
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerintereste
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerintereste
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerintereste
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Aniceday,isn’tit?W:Yes,itis.M:Uuh...youlookfamili
[originaltext](22)Afewdegreescanmakeabigdifferencewhenitcomesto
【B1】[br]【B5】22-seats→22-seat本题考查构词法。这里是将数词和名词结合构成复合形容词,在构词时要将名词后的复数词尾去掉。
下列不属于老年小组工作特点的是()。A.在预估阶段要特别注意老人身体、心理、社
材料: 教师出示《明朝辽阔疆域图》后提问:朱元璋灭掉元朝建立明朝以后,他看到自
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
(2015年真题)社会工作者小王接待了来机构求助的小李夫妇,在他们讲述问题后,小
一个国家或地区在一定时期内的国际收支情况,都被综合记录和反映在该国家或地区的(
某公司是一家发展良好的家族企业。在多年的发展中,公司采取的是粗放的管理方式,没有
应通过试桩或做沉桩试验后会同监理及设计单位研究确定的沉入桩指标是( )。A.贯入
最新回复
(
0
)