首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2024-02-02
47
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] Susan Aspey looks at the funding by the government with_____.
选项
A、criticism
B、consent
C、indifference
D、expectation
答案
B
解析
观点态度题。本题考查文章人物的观点。苏珊.阿斯贝的观点态度只能从第5段推断出,从这一段中的defended和record amount of funding可知她对教育部的拨款数是认同的。选项A和C都是贬义词,不可能表达她的观点;选项D虽是褒义词,但苏珊是在陈述已发生的事实,而不是发表对教育部的期望。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3414640.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Ihaven’treceivedthefurnitureIorderedyet.MaybeIshould
[originaltext]M:Ihaven’treceivedthefurnitureIorderedyet.MaybeIshould
[originaltext]M:Ihaven’treceivedthefurnitureIorderedyet.MaybeIshould
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]M:IjustreceivedanE-mailfromoneofmyformerclassmates.I
[originaltext]Therearebetween3,000and6,000publiclanguagesintheworl
Foryears,highschoolstudentshavereceivedidenticaltextbooksastheirc
随机试题
Students’pressuresometimescomesfromtheirparents.Mostparentsarewell
[originaltext]Kenyawasabeautifulcountryinhabitedbydifferentgroupso
Noonewhoreadsthenewspaperscandoubttheseriousnessofcrimeinthisc
以下关于开标与评标的叙述中,不正确的是( )。A.评标委员会的数量为单数,其中
微伽级重力仪的检定周期为()年。A.l B.2 C.3
女婴,生后第3天出现皮肤轻度黄染,一般情况良好,血清胆红素170μmol/L(1
超额准备金在控制流动性方面起着重要的作用,下列关于超额准备金率的定义正确的是(
A.±2% B.±5% C.±7% D.±8% E.±10%1.5~6g
(2020年真题)下列各项中,注册会计师无需与其利用的外部专家达成一致意见的是(
FIDIC中有关施工进度管理说法,正确的是()。A.合同未作约定时,承包商应
最新回复
(
0
)