首页
登录
职称英语
Big is Back A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now t
Big is Back A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now t
游客
2024-01-29
33
管理
问题
Big is Back
A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now they have the advantage again. In 1996, in one of his most celebrated phrases, Bill Clinton declared that "the era of big government is over". He might have added that the era of big companies was over, too. The organisation that defined capitalism for much of the 20th century was then in retreat, attacked by corporate raiders, annoyed by shareholders and outwitted by entrepreneurs (企业家). Great names such as Pan Am had disappeared. Others had survived only by huge bloodletting: IBM sacked 122,000 people, a quarter of its workforce, between 1990 and 1995. Everyone agreed that the future lay with entrepreneurial start-ups such as Yahoo! —which in late 1998 had the same market capitalisation with 637 employees as Boeing with 230,000. The share of GDP produced by big industrial companies fell by half between 1974 and 1998, from 36% to 17%.
B) Today the balance of advantage may be shifting again. To a degree, the financial crisis is responsible. It has destroyed the venture-capital market, the lifeblood of many young firms. Governments have been rescuing companies they consider too big to fail, such as Citigroup and General Motors. Recession is squeezing out smaller and less well-connected firms. But there are other reasons too, which are giving big companies a self-confidence they have not displayed for decades.
C) Of course, big companies never went away. There were still plenty of first-rate ones: Unilever and Toyota continued to innovate through thick and thin. And not all start-ups were models of success: Netscape and Enron promised to revolutionise their industries only to crash and burn. Nevertheless, the balance had shifted in favour of small organisations. The entrepreneurial boom was supercharged by two developments. Deregulation (撤销管制规定) opened protected markets. Some national champions, such as AT&T, were broken up. Others saw their markets eaten up by swift-footed newcomers. The arrival of the personal computer in the 1970s and the internet in the 1990s created an army of successful start-ups. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak founded Apple Computer in 1976 in the Jobs family’s garage. Microsoft and Dell Computer were both founded by teenagers (in 1975 and 1984 respectively). Larry Page and Sergey Brin started Google in Stanford dorm rooms.
D) But deregulation had already begun to go out of fashion before the financial crisis. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, introduced after Enron collapsed in disgrace, increased the regulatory burden on companies of all sizes, but what could be borne by the big could cripple the small. Many of today’s most dynamic industries are much more friendly to big companies than the IT industry. Research in biotechnology is costly and often does not bear fruit for years. Natural-resource companies, whose importance grows as competition for resources intensifies, need to be big—hence the mining industry’s consolidation.
E) Two further developments are shifting the balance of advantage in favour of size. One is a heightened awareness of the risks of subcontracting (转包合同). Toy companies and pet-food firms alike have found that their brands can be hurt if their suppliers turn out goods of poor quality. Big industrial companies have learned that their production cycles can be broken up if contractors are not up to the mark. Boeing, once a champion of subcontracting, has been forced to take over slow suppliers. A second is the emergence of companies that have discovered how to be entrepreneurial as well as big. These giants are getting better at minimising the costs of size (such as longer, more complex chains of managerial command) while exploiting its advantages (such as presence in several markets and access to a large talent pool). Cisco Systems is pioneering the use of its own video technology to improve communications between its employees. IBM has carried out several company-wide brainstorming exercises, recently involving more than 150,000 people, that have encouraged it to put more emphasis, for example, on green computing. Disney has successfully taken Pixar’s creative magic.
F) You might suppose that the return of the mighty, now better equipped to crush the competition, is something to worry about. Not necessarily. Big is not always ugly just as small is not always beautiful. Most entrepreneurs dream of turning their start-ups into giants (or at least of selling them to giants for a fortune). There is a symbiosis (互利合作关系) between large and small. "Cloud computing" would not provide young firms with access to huge amounts of computer power if big companies had not created giant servers. Biotech start-ups would go bust were they not given work by giants with deep pockets.
G) The most successful economic ecosystems contain a variety of big and small companies: Silicon Valley boasts long-established names as well as an ever-changing array of start-ups. America’s economy has been more dynamic than Europe’s in recent decades not just because it is better at giving birth to companies but also because it is better at letting them grow. Only 5% of European Union companies born since 1980 have made it into the list of the 1,000 biggest in the EU by market capitalisation. In America, the figure is 22%.
H) The return of the giants could well be a blessing for the world economy—but only if business people and policymakers avoid certain mistakes. Businesses should not admire size blindly, particularly if this means diversifying into a lot of unrelated areas. The model of joint business may be tempting when cash is hard to find. But the moment will not last. By and large, the most successful big firms focus on their core businesses.
I) Policymakers should both resist an instinctive suspicion of big companies and avoid the old error of embracing national champions. It is bad enough that governments have diverted resources into supporting failing companies such as General Motors. It would be even more regrettable if they were to return to picking winners. The best use of their energies is to remove the burdens and barriers which prevent entrepreneurs from starting businesses and turning small companies into big ones. [br] By and large, the most successful big companies focus on their core businesses and will give up the model of joint business.
选项
答案
H
解析
根据core、businesses及joint business可定位至H段最后三句。倒数第2、3句否定了joint business的模式,最后一句则与题目意思一致,说成功的企业会专注于其核心业务,故本题出处在H段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3405139.html
相关试题推荐
CorporateAmbitions:Amazon,theWorld’sMostRemarkableFirm,IsJustGetti
CorporateAmbitions:Amazon,theWorld’sMostRemarkableFirm,IsJustGetti
CorporateAmbitions:Amazon,theWorld’sMostRemarkableFirm,IsJustGetti
CorporateAmbitions:Amazon,theWorld’sMostRemarkableFirm,IsJustGetti
CorporateAmbitions:Amazon,theWorld’sMostRemarkableFirm,IsJustGetti
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
随机试题
[audioFiles]2016m12s/audio_ezfj_201610_018[/audioFiles]Children’sHealth
Directions:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayent
企业是安全生产的责任主体,也是安全生产标准化建设的主体。()
落锤式弯沉仪组成不包括()A.荷载发生装置 B.弯沉检测装置 C.载重汽车
什么是幼儿园一日生活常规(2分)试述培养幼儿一日生活常规意义和方法。(18分)
资本一帝国主义列强对中国不但进行军事侵略、政治控制,还对中国进行经济掠夺。其对中
下列哪项不是MDS的特点?( )A.老年多见 B.血细胞病态造血 C.易转
《孔乙己》中下列行为及说法符合现代法律规定的是()A.丁举人打折孔乙己的腿
物流成本管理的主要方法有( )。A.比较分析法 B.定量分析法 C.综合评价
关于多品种小批量型生产物流特征的说法,错误的是()。A.物料被加工的重复程度介于
最新回复
(
0
)