首页
登录
职称英语
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
游客
2024-01-24
11
管理
问题
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?
A)Some have called it a Right to Die case. Others have labeled it a Right to Live case. One group of advocates has called for "death with dignity." Others have responded accusingly, "euthanasia".
B)At the center of the latest controversy about life and death, medicine and law, is a seventy-eight-year-old Massachusetts man whose existence hangs on a court order.
C)On one point, everyone agrees: Earle Spring is not the man he used to be. Once a strapping outdoorsman, he is now called senile by many, and mentally incompetent by the courts. He is, at worst, a member of living dead; at best, a shriveled version of his former self.
D)For more than two years, since his physical and then mental health began to deteriorate , Earle Spring has been kept alive by spending five hours on a kidney dialysis machine three times a week. Since January 1979, his family has pleaded to have him removed from the life-support system.
E)They believe deeply that he Earle Spring who was would not want to live as the Earle Spring who is. They believe they are advocates for the right to die in peace.
F)In the beginning, the court agrees. Possibly for the first time, they reeled last month in favor of withdrawing medical care from an elderly patient whose mind had deteriorated. The dialysis was stopped.
G)But then, in a sudden intervention, an outside nurse and doctor visited Earle Spring and testified that he was alert enough to "make a weak expression of his desire to live." And so the treatments were resumed.
H)Now, while the courts are waiting for new and more thorough evidence about Spring’ s mental state, the controversy rages about legal procedures; no judge ever visited Spring, no psychiatrist ever testified. And even more important, we are again forced to determine one person’ s right to die or to live.
I)This case makes the Karen Ann Quinlan story seem simple in comparison. Quinlan today hangs onto her "life" long after her "plug was pulled." But when the New Jersey court heard that case, Quinlan had no will. She had suffered brain death by any definition.
J)The Spring story is different. He is neither competent nor comatose. He lives in a gray area of consciousness. So the questions also range over the gray area of our consciences.
K)What should the relationship be between mental and physical treatment? Should we treat the incompetent as aggressively as the competent? Should we order heart surgery for one senile citizen? Should we take another off a kidney machine? Who is to decide?
L)Until recently, we didn’t have the technology to keep Earle Spring alive. Until recently, the-life-and-death decisions about the senile elderly or the retarded or the institutionalized were made privately between families and medical people. Now, increasingly, in States like Massachusetts, they are made publicly and legally.
M)Clearly there are no absolutes in this case. No right to die. No right to live. We have to take into account many social as well as medical factors. How much of the resources of a society or a family should be allotted to a member who no longer recognizes it? How many sacrifices should the healthy and vital make for the terminally or permanently ill and disabled?
N)In England, where kidney dialysis machines are scarce, Earle Spring would never have remained on one. In America, one Earle Spring can decimate the energy and income of an entire family.
O)But the Spring case is a crucial, scary one that could affect all those living under that dubious sentence "incompetent" or that shaky diagnosis "senile". So it seems to me that if there is any mental activity at all, then disconnecting him from life would be a dangerous precedent, far more dangerous than letting him continue.
P)The court ruled originally in favor of taking Spring off the machine. It ruled that this is what Earle Spring would have wanted. I have no doubt that his family believes it. I have no doubt of their affection or their pain.
Q)But I remember, too, what my grandfather used to say: No one wants to live to be one hundred until you ask the man who is ninety-nine. Well, no one, including Earle Spring, wants to live to be senile. But once senile, he may well want to live. We simply have to give him the benefit of the doubt. Any doubt. [br] Earle Spring’s treatments were resumed due to his own desire to live.
选项
答案
G
解析
题干:由于厄尔·斯普林自己想要生存的愿望,他的治疗才重新开始。题干关键词是treatments,resumed和desire。文中G段提到,后来,一位护士和医生去看望厄尔·斯普林,发现并证实了他尚有意识能够表示自己想活下去,因此治疗又开始了。与题干意思吻合,故选G。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3391309.html
相关试题推荐
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
扬州,时称广陵,其建城可追溯至公元前(B.C.)486年。TheestablishmentofYangzhouwhichwascalledGuan
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
[originaltext]TheBritishgovernmenthascalledformorementoconsiderac
随机试题
Whocanusethisreadingroom?______ofthiscollege.[br]Whatarenotallowe
[originaltext]M:HowdoyoulikeProfessorBookman’scourseontheHistoryofP
心肌不产生完全强直收缩的原因是心肌A.为机能合胞体 B. C.有自律性 D
按现行政策规定,国家助学贷款的额度按照本、专科学生每人每学年最高不超过( )元
如果账簿前一页登记已满,则翻页后可以直接继续连续登记。(错误)温馨提示:判断题请
急性肺损伤的病理生理基础是A.白细胞大量激活B.肺泡内皮细胞广泛受损C.广泛的肺
画出具有重复接地时,当保护零线断线后的接地电流示意图。
关于流动比率的说法中,错误的是( )。A.流动比率=(流动资产总额-存货)/流动
材料:2013年11月12日中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第三次全体会议通过《
根据《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》GB50500-2013的规定,下列属于工程
最新回复
(
0
)