首页
登录
职称英语
The AlphaGo program’ s victory is an example of how smart computers have beco
The AlphaGo program’ s victory is an example of how smart computers have beco
游客
2024-01-24
19
管理
问题
The AlphaGo program’ s victory is an example of how smart computers have become.
But can artificial intelligence (AI) machines act ethically, meaning can they be honest and fair?
One example of AI is driverless cars. They are already on California roads, so it is not too soon to ask whether we can program a machine to act ethically. As driverless cars improve, they will save lives. They will make fewer mistakes than human drivers do. Sometimes, however, they will face a choice between lives. Should the cars be programmed to avoid hitting a child running across the road, even if that will put their passengers at risk? What about making a sudden turn to avoid a dog? What if the only risk is damage to the car itself, not to the passengers?
Perhaps there will be lessons to learn from driverless cars, but they are not super-intelligent beings. Teaching ethics to a machine even more intelligent than we are will be the bigger challenge.
About the same time as AlphaGo’ s triumph, Microsoft’ s "chatbot" took a bad turn. The software, named Taylor, was designed to answer messages from people aged 18 -24. Taylor was supposed to be able to learn from the messages she received. She was designed to slowly improve her ability to handle conversations, but some people were teaching Taylor racist ideas. When she started saying nice things about Hitler, Microsoft turned her off and deleted her ugliest messages.
AlphaGo’ s victory and Taylor’ s defeat happened at about the same time. This should be a warning to us. It is one thing to use AI within a game with clear rules and clear goals. It is something very different to use AI in the real world. The unpredictability of the real world may bring to the surface a troubling software problem.
Eric Schmidt is one of the bosses of Google, which owns AlphaGo. He thinks AI will be positive for humans. He said people will be the winner, whatever the outcome. Advances in AI will make human beings smarter, more able and "just better human beings". [br] What does Eric Schmidt think of artificial intelligence?
选项
A、It will be far superior to human beings.
B、It will keep improving as time goes by.
C、It will prove to be an asset to human beings.
D、It will be here to stay whatever the outcome.
答案
C
解析
推理题。原文最后一段指出,埃里克-施密特认为人工智能对人类有着积极的意义,人工智能的进步将使人类更聪明、更有能力,“人类只会变得更好”,由此可知,埃里克-施密特认为人工智能不会危害人类,而是为人所用,是人类的财富,故答案为C。A项与埃里克-施密特的观点不符,他认为人类是最终的赢家,而不是人工智能,故排除。B、D两项原文均未提及,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3388987.html
相关试题推荐
这是中国网友运用聪明才智和创造力为老词注入新生命的又一个例子。ThisisanotherexampleofChineseInternetusers
[originaltext](1)Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawship
[originaltext](1)Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawship
TheAlphaGoprogram’svictoryisanexampleofhowsmartcomputershavebeco
Onlineprogramstofightdepressionarealreadycommerciallyavailable.While
Onlineprogramstofightdepressionarealreadycommerciallyavailable.While
Onlineprogramstofightdepressionarealreadycommerciallyavailable.While
[originaltext]Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawshipmentsf
[originaltext]Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawshipmentsf
[originaltext](3)TheUN’sWorldFoodProgram(WFP)andAgricultureandFood
随机试题
Howdopeopleoftenmeasureprogressinagriculture?[br]Whatistheauthor’sp
Snowisasubjectofgreatinteresttoweatherexperts.Expertssometimesha
[originaltext]Membersofthecitycouncilanddistinguishedguests,(7)iti
Questions14-17Thetexthas8paragraphs(A-H).Whichparagraphdoeseachofthe
一个人面对问题情境时,不墨守成规,不钻牛角尖,能随机应变,触类旁通,对同一问题想
CSMA/CD协议可以利用多种监听算法来减小发送冲突的概率,下面关于各种监听算法
宫口开全,先露在棘下3cm,胎头矢状缝与骨盆横径一致,枕骨位于母体左侧3点钟方向
依照《关于禁止商业贿赂行为的暂行规定》,属于商业贿赂行为的包括A、经营者在商品交
依据国家电网公司变电检测通用管理规定,检测工作培训项目应包括:()。(A)变
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》(GB50854-2013),砌筑工程量
最新回复
(
0
)