首页
登录
职称英语
The AlphaGo program’ s victory is an example of how smart computers have beco
The AlphaGo program’ s victory is an example of how smart computers have beco
游客
2024-01-24
56
管理
问题
The AlphaGo program’ s victory is an example of how smart computers have become.
But can artificial intelligence (AI) machines act ethically, meaning can they be honest and fair?
One example of AI is driverless cars. They are already on California roads, so it is not too soon to ask whether we can program a machine to act ethically. As driverless cars improve, they will save lives. They will make fewer mistakes than human drivers do. Sometimes, however, they will face a choice between lives. Should the cars be programmed to avoid hitting a child running across the road, even if that will put their passengers at risk? What about making a sudden turn to avoid a dog? What if the only risk is damage to the car itself, not to the passengers?
Perhaps there will be lessons to learn from driverless cars, but they are not super-intelligent beings. Teaching ethics to a machine even more intelligent than we are will be the bigger challenge.
About the same time as AlphaGo’ s triumph, Microsoft’ s "chatbot" took a bad turn. The software, named Taylor, was designed to answer messages from people aged 18 -24. Taylor was supposed to be able to learn from the messages she received. She was designed to slowly improve her ability to handle conversations, but some people were teaching Taylor racist ideas. When she started saying nice things about Hitler, Microsoft turned her off and deleted her ugliest messages.
AlphaGo’ s victory and Taylor’ s defeat happened at about the same time. This should be a warning to us. It is one thing to use AI within a game with clear rules and clear goals. It is something very different to use AI in the real world. The unpredictability of the real world may bring to the surface a troubling software problem.
Eric Schmidt is one of the bosses of Google, which owns AlphaGo. He thinks AI will be positive for humans. He said people will be the winner, whatever the outcome. Advances in AI will make human beings smarter, more able and "just better human beings". [br] What does Eric Schmidt think of artificial intelligence?
选项
A、It will be far superior to human beings.
B、It will keep improving as time goes by.
C、It will prove to be an asset to human beings.
D、It will be here to stay whatever the outcome.
答案
C
解析
推理题。原文最后一段指出,埃里克-施密特认为人工智能对人类有着积极的意义,人工智能的进步将使人类更聪明、更有能力,“人类只会变得更好”,由此可知,埃里克-施密特认为人工智能不会危害人类,而是为人所用,是人类的财富,故答案为C。A项与埃里克-施密特的观点不符,他认为人类是最终的赢家,而不是人工智能,故排除。B、D两项原文均未提及,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3388987.html
相关试题推荐
这是中国网友运用聪明才智和创造力为老词注入新生命的又一个例子。ThisisanotherexampleofChineseInternetusers
[originaltext](1)Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawship
[originaltext](1)Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawship
TheAlphaGoprogram’svictoryisanexampleofhowsmartcomputershavebeco
Onlineprogramstofightdepressionarealreadycommerciallyavailable.While
Onlineprogramstofightdepressionarealreadycommerciallyavailable.While
Onlineprogramstofightdepressionarealreadycommerciallyavailable.While
[originaltext]Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawshipmentsf
[originaltext]Fallingglobaldemandforpersonalcomputers(PC)sawshipmentsf
[originaltext](3)TheUN’sWorldFoodProgram(WFP)andAgricultureandFood
随机试题
Ifhe______(be)herelastnight,Iwouldhavespokentohim.hadbeen虚拟语气。此题考查与
数据是对客观事物的真实反映,它没有掺杂任何主观性因素,可以是()。A.数字 B
A.NAP积分明显增高B.NAP积分明显减低C.骨髓穿刺常常干抽D.外周血有异形
由资金供求关系和风险收益等因素决定的利率被称为()。A:实际利率 B:官方利率
2010年滨海旅游业增加值为()亿元。 A.15220.4 B.1510
2007-136.可治疗心肾两虚证的方剂是 A.金锁固精丸B.桑螵蛸散C.
教师教学和学生获得知识的基本材料是()。 A.教学大纲B.课程计划 C.
中国外汇交易中心显示的人民币对主要币种的汇率中间价如下表所示: 2020年
因抢救急危患者,未能按时书写病历的,有关医务人员应当在抢救结束后据实补记的时限是
甲建筑公司向乙水泥厂发出采购100吨水泥的要约,乙于10月1日寄出承诺信件。10
最新回复
(
0
)