首页
登录
职称英语
The new US health-insurance rules are designed to help those caught in Medic
The new US health-insurance rules are designed to help those caught in Medic
游客
2024-01-20
17
管理
问题
The new US health-insurance rules are designed to help those caught in Medicare’s "doughnut hole", offer seniors more preventative (预防性的) care, and limit how much of their customers’ money health-insurance companies can keep for overhead and profit.
The new rules include:
* A provision that limits what health insurers can do with the money their customers send in as premiums(保险金).
The rule requires that insurers spend at least 80 percent of this money on the customers themselves. The companies must either spend this money to pay insurance claims or use it for activities that improve customers’ health.
For policies (保险单) that are sold to large groups instead of small companies and individuals, the number is even higher; 85 percent. The remaining 15 or 20 percent of the money can be used for a company’s salaries, marketing and overhead—or kept as profit.
Previously, there was no federal restrictions on insurance companies’ spending. The federal government says some insurers kept 30 or even 50 percent. Insurance companies say this could cause them to cut back on the services they offer, or even pull out of states where administrative costs are higher. State officials also worry that the companies might cut the fees they pay to insurance brokers. That, they fear, would eliminate key middlemen who help individuals navigate a complicated insurance system.
* A provision that provides prescription-drug discounts for seniors in Medicare’s "doughnut hole". The doughnut hole is a controversial gap in the Medicare prescription-drug benefit passed in 2003. In 2010, for instance, Medicare paid for part of the cost of drugs, until the total cost of the drugs hit $2,830.
After that, seniors were responsible for 100 percent of the cost of their drugs, until they had spent $ 3,610 of their own money. That was the other side of the doughnut hole, and federal insurance kicked in again. This provision would give Medicare recipients stuck in the doughnut hole a 50 percent discount on the price of brand-name prescription drugs. Health-care activists are worried, however, that drugmakers will jack up their prices. In that case, customers would receive 50 percent off that higher number, which might not be much less than what they were paying before. [br] Why does the federal government begin to restrict insurance companies’ spending?
选项
A、There was no federal restrictions on such an issue before.
B、The federal government wants companies to cut back on the services.
C、The federal government wants to eliminate key middlemen.
D、The federal government believes some insurers kept too much of their customers’ money.
答案
I
解析
由题干中的insurance companies’ spending定位到第六段前两句。推理判断题。定位句主要讲述联邦政府对保险公司的开支采取限制的原因。即联邦政府认为有的保险公司截留投保人30%或50%的保险金。题干针对联邦政府对保险公司开支的限制原因提问,故D)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3379971.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjoyp
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext] (23)TheExmobaby,atinyshirtdesignedtomonitoraninfant’s
ThenewUShealth-insurancerulesaredesignedtohelpthosecaughtinMedic
随机试题
以下对建筑智能化工程描述正确的是()。A.以微电流、微电压的传输为主 B.仅
为了控制热拌沥青混合料的施工质量,需进行施工过程的质量控制,请回答以下问题:(1
A.健脾丸B.温脾汤C.济川煎D.黄龙汤E.麻子仁丸治疗肾虚便秘,首选的方剂是
变电站征地范围应为站区围墙外()m。如需设置挡土墙、排水沟或边坡时,根据挡土
2012年,某地区农作物播种总面积达到1625.55万亩,同比增长4.6%。
股份有限公司的资本,是指在公司登记机关登记的()。A:资产总额B:股份资本C
关于阻抗,下列说法中正确的是()A.出现阻抗属于正常现象,咨询师完全不必在意
某药材,为伞形科植物羌活或宽叶羌活的干燥根茎及根。若该药材有的根茎粗大,不规则结
某工程项目经理部为贯彻落实《住房和城乡建设部等部门关于加快培育新时代建筑产业工人
成品隔断的工程量计算,下面说法正确的是()A.按设计图示尺寸以洞口面积计算
最新回复
(
0
)