首页
登录
职称英语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading
游客
2024-01-08
23
管理
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
Keep taking the tablets
The history of aspirin is a product of a rollercoaster ride through time, of accidental discoveries, intuitive reasoning and intense corporate rivalry.
In the opening pages of Aspirin: The Remarkable Story of a Wonder Drug, Diarmuid Jeffreys describes this little white pill as ’one of the most amazing creations in medical history, a drug so astonishingly versatile that it can relieve headache, ease your aching limbs, lower your temperature and treat some of the deadliest human diseases’.
Its properties have been known for thousands of years. Ancient Egyptian physicians used extracts from the willow tree as an analgesic, or pain killer. Centuries later the Greek physician Hippocrates recommended the bark of the willow tree as a remedy for the pains of childbirth and as a fever reducer. But it wasn’t until the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that salicylates — the chemical found in the willow tree — became the subject of serious scientific investigation. The race was on to identify the active ingredient and to replicate it synthetically. At the end of the nineteenth century a German company, Friedrich Bayer & Co, succeeded in creating a relatively safe and very effective chemical compound, acetylsalicylic acid, which was renamed aspirin.
The late nineteenth century was a fertile period for experimentation, partly because of the hunger among scientists to answer some of the great scientific questions, but also because those questions were within their means to answer. One scientist in a laboratory with some chemicals and a test tube could make significant breakthroughs — whereas today, in order to map the human genome for instance, one needs ’an army of researchers, a bank of computers and millions and millions of dollars’.
But an understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry is not enough on its own to explain how society innovates. In the nineteenth century, scientific advance was closely linked to the industrial revolution. This was a period when people frequently had the means, motive and determination to take an idea and turn it into reality. In the case of aspirin that happened piecemeal — a series of minor, often unrelated advances, fertilised by the century’s broader economic, medical and scientific developments, that led to one big final breakthrough.
The link between big money and pharmaceutical innovation is also a significant one. Aspirin’s continued shelf life was ensured because for the first 70 years of its life, huge amounts of money were put into promoting it as an ordinary everyday analgesic. In the 1970s other analgesics, such as ibuprofen and paracetamol, were entering the market, and the pharmaceutical companies then focused on publicising these new drugs. But just at the same time, discoveries were made regarding the beneficial role of aspirin in preventing heart attacks, strokes and other afflictions. Had it not been for these findings, this pharmaceutical marvel may well have disappeared.
So the relationship between big money and drugs is an odd one. Commercial markets are necessary for developing new products and ensuring that they remain around long enough for scientists to carry out research on them. But the commercial markets are just as likely to kill off certain products when something more attractive comes along. In the case of aspirin, a potential ’wonder drug’ was around for over 70 years without anybody investigating the way in which it achieved its effects, because they were making more than enough money out of it as it was. If ibuprofen or paracetamol had entered the market just a decade earlier, aspirin might then not be here today. It would be just another forgotten drug that people hadn’t bothered to explore.
None of the recent discoveries of aspirin’s benefits were made by the big pharmaceutical companies; they were made by scientists working in the public sector. ’The reason for that is very simple and straightforward,’ Jeffreys says in his book. ’Drug companies will only pursue research that is going to deliver financial benefits. There’s no profit in aspirin any more. It is incredibly inexpensive with tiny profit margins and it has no patent any more, so anyone can produce it.’ In fact, there’s almost a disincentive for drug companies to further boost the drug, he argues, as it could possibly put them out of business by stopping them from selling their more expensive brands.
So what is the solution to a lack of commercial interest in further exploring the therapeutic benefits of aspirin? More public money going into clinical trials, says Jeffreys. ’If I were the Department of Health, I would say "this is a very inexpensive drug. There may be a lot of other things we could do with it." We should put a lot more money into trying to find out.’
Jeffreys’ book — which not only tells the tale of a ’wonder drug’ but also explores the nature of innovation and the role of big business, public money and regulation — reminds us why such research is so important.
Questions 27-32
Complete each sentence with the correct ending A-H from the box below.
Write the correct letter A-H in boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet.
A the discovery of new medical applications.
B the negative effects of publicity.
C the large pharmaceutical companies.
D the industrial revolution.
E the medical uses of a particular tree.
F the limited availability of new drugs.
G the chemical found in the willow tree.
H commercial advertising campaigns. [br] The development of aspirin was partly due to the effects of
选项
答案
D
解析
Paragraph 4: ... scientific advance was closely linked to the industrial revolution... In the case of aspirin that happened piecemeal... fertilised by the century’s broader economic, medical and scientific developments...
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3344953.html
相关试题推荐
Thatcritic’swritingissoobscureanddensethatuponfirstreading,onefinds
Believingthatscientistsshould(i)______thepublicaboutimportantscientific
Theconclusionofsuchavastandcomplexbookshouldhavecontaineda(i)______
Readerslookingforanothercondemnationofprivateequityfirmsshouldlookels
Individualfreedomofthoughtshouldbe(i)______moreabsolutelythanindividua
AdamSmith’sWealthofNations(1776)isstillworthreading,moretoappreciate
The(i)____questionsthatconsistentlystructurethestudyofhistorymustbed
Her____shouldnotbeconfusedwithmiserliness;aslongasIhaveknownher,s
Philosophicalproblemsarisewhenpeopleaskquestionsthat,thoughvery____,h
Peopleshouldnotbepraisedfortheirvirtueiftheylacktheenergytobe(i)_
随机试题
(1)Thelevelofdiscriminationhasvariedenormouslyinthehistoryofhuman
某单位拟在椿树、枣树、楝树、雪松、银杏、桃树中选择4种栽种在庭院中。已知:(1)
A.食管下段静脉曲张 B.食管炎 C.食管息肉 D.食管平滑肌瘤 E.食
关于“疑义的利益”的解释原则,下列说法错误的是()。A:该原则要求当保险合同条款
下列哪项不是羊水过多的体征A.腹部膨大 B.子宫大小与孕月相符 C.胎心遥远
系统性红斑狼疮是指<P>A.病变累及骨、关节及肌腱、滑囊、筋膜等周围软组织的一组
下列关于声明不保证的表述,不正确的是( )。A.声明不保证是指由于委托人、拍卖
下列属于回归模型特性的是()。 A.一元线性冋归模型是用于分析一个自变量Y
下列不属于营业收入的可靠性分析的是( )。A.营业收入的现金含量分析 B.营
(2020年真题)根据《建设项目环境影响评价报告书(表)编制监督管理办法》,关于
最新回复
(
0
)