首页
登录
职称英语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading P
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading P
游客
2024-01-08
35
管理
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
Going Nowhere Fast
THIS is ludicrous! We can talk to people anywhere in the world or fly to meet them in a few hours. We can even send probes to other planets. But when it comes to getting around our cities, we depend on systems that have scarcely changed since the days of Gottlieb Daimler.
In recent years, the pollution belched out by millions of vehicles has dominated the debate about transport. The problem has even persuaded California—that home of car culture—to curb traffic growth. But no matter how green they become, cars are unlikely to get us around crowded cities any faster. And persuading people to use trains and buses will always be an uphill struggle. Cars, after all, are popular for very good reasons, as anyone with small children or heavy shopping knows.
So politicians should be trying to lure people out of their cars, not forcing them out. There’s certainly no shortage of alternatives. Perhaps the most attractive is the concept known as personal rapid transit(PRT), independently invented in the US and Europe in the 1950s.
The idea is to go to one of many stations and hop into a computer-controlled car which can whisk you to your destination along a network of guideways. You wouldn’t have to share your space with strangers, and with no traffic lights, pedestrians or parked cars to slow things down, PRT guideways can carry far more traffic, nonstop, than any inner city road.
It’s a wonderful vision, but the odds are stacked against PRT for a number of reasons. The first cars ran on existing roads, and it was only after they became popular—and after governments started earning revenue from them—that a road network designed specifically for motor vehicles was built. With PRT, the infrastructure would have to come first—and that would cost megabucks. What’s more, any transport system that threatened the car’s dominance would be up against all those with a stake in maintaining the status quo, from private car owners to manufacturers and oil multinationals. Even if PRTs were spectacularly successful in trials, it might not make much difference. Superior technology doesn’t always triumph, as the VHS versus Betamax and Windows versus Apple Mac battles showed.
But "dual-mode" systems might just succeed where PRT seems doomed to fail. The Danish RUF system envisaged by Palle Jensen, for example, resembles PRT but with one key difference: vehicles have wheels as well as a slot allowing them to travel on a monorail, so they can drive off the rail onto a normal road. Once on a road, the occupant would take over from the computer, and the RUF vehicle—the term comes from a Danish saying meaning to "go fast"—would become an electric car.
Build a fast network of guideways in a busy city centre and people would have a strong incentive not just to use public RUF vehicles, but also to buy their own dual-mode vehicle. Commuters could drive onto the guideway, sit back and read as they are chauffeured into the city. At work, they would jump out, leaving their vehicles to park themselves. Unlike PRT, such a system could grow organically, as each network would serve a large area around it and people nearby could buy into it. And a dual-mode system might even win the support of car manufacturers, who could easily switch to producing dual-mode vehicles.
Of course, creating a new transport system will not be cheap or easy. But unlike adding a dedicated bus lane here or extending the underground railway there, an innovative system such as Jensen’s could transform cities.
And it’s not just a matter of saving a few minutes a day. According to the Red Cross, more than 30 million people have died in road accidents in the past century—three times the number killed in the First World War—and the annual death toll is rising. And what’s more, the Red Cross believes road accidents will become the third biggest cause of death and disability by 2020, ahead of diseases such as AIDS and tuberculosis. Surely we can find a better way to get around?
Questions 1-6
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this [br] Public transport is particularly difficult to use on steep hills.
选项
A、真
B、假
C、Not Given
答案
C
解析
利用细节词“steep hills”定位于原文第二段倒数第二句话“And persuading people touse trains and buses will always be an uphill struggle”。原文虽然提及“uphill”但是表达的意思并非是公众交通在陡峭山地难以使用,而是说劝服人们改用公众交通就像上山一样困难。题目信息无法在原文基础上进行判断,所以答案为Not Given。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3343888.html
相关试题推荐
CompletethesummarybelowwithwordstakenfromReadingPassage2.Use
CompletethesummarybelowwithwordstakenfromReadingPassage2.Use
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions33-40)andthelistofpeoplein
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions33-40)andthelistofpeoplein
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions33-40)andthelistofpeoplein
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions33-40)andthelistofpeoplein
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions33-40)andthelistofpeoplein
READINGHavinganabundanceofstuffisasymptomof21stCenturymaterialis
READINGHavinganabundanceofstuffisasymptomof21stCenturymaterialis
READINGHavinganabundanceofstuffisasymptomof21stCenturymaterialis
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Yeah,that’strue.Ithinkthattheimportantthingaboutregr
[originaltext]M:Hey!Jenny,doyouwanttolivealongerlife?W:Why?Ofcour
日常生活中,我们常听到某些饮料的广告词称自己“富含钙、锌”等等,这里的“钙”“锌
某企业的培训关系模式R(培训科目,培训师,学生,成绩,时间,教室),R的函数依赖
分布透明性指用户不必关心数据的逻辑分片,不必关心数据存储的物理位置分配细节,也不
下列有关红细胞渗透脆性试验,说法正确的是A.是红细胞酶缺陷的筛选试验 B.脆性
不属于升压药物的是A、肾上腺素 B、多巴胺 C、糖皮质激素 D、间羟胺
山东省青岛市为了制定本市教育发展规划,由市教育局、统计局和发展与改革委员会共同组
可行性研究的结论主要是说明项目的财务评价结果,表明项目( )。A.是否有足够的
(2019年真题)根据《建设工程监理规范》,竣工验收阶段建设监理工作的主要任务是
最新回复
(
0
)