首页
登录
职称英语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading P
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading P
游客
2024-01-08
42
管理
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
Going Nowhere Fast
THIS is ludicrous! We can talk to people anywhere in the world or fly to meet them in a few hours. We can even send probes to other planets. But when it comes to getting around our cities, we depend on systems that have scarcely changed since the days of Gottlieb Daimler.
In recent years, the pollution belched out by millions of vehicles has dominated the debate about transport. The problem has even persuaded California—that home of car culture—to curb traffic growth. But no matter how green they become, cars are unlikely to get us around crowded cities any faster. And persuading people to use trains and buses will always be an uphill struggle. Cars, after all, are popular for very good reasons, as anyone with small children or heavy shopping knows.
So politicians should be trying to lure people out of their cars, not forcing them out. There’s certainly no shortage of alternatives. Perhaps the most attractive is the concept known as personal rapid transit(PRT), independently invented in the US and Europe in the 1950s.
The idea is to go to one of many stations and hop into a computer-controlled car which can whisk you to your destination along a network of guideways. You wouldn’t have to share your space with strangers, and with no traffic lights, pedestrians or parked cars to slow things down, PRT guideways can carry far more traffic, nonstop, than any inner city road.
It’s a wonderful vision, but the odds are stacked against PRT for a number of reasons. The first cars ran on existing roads, and it was only after they became popular—and after governments started earning revenue from them—that a road network designed specifically for motor vehicles was built. With PRT, the infrastructure would have to come first—and that would cost megabucks. What’s more, any transport system that threatened the car’s dominance would be up against all those with a stake in maintaining the status quo, from private car owners to manufacturers and oil multinationals. Even if PRTs were spectacularly successful in trials, it might not make much difference. Superior technology doesn’t always triumph, as the VHS versus Betamax and Windows versus Apple Mac battles showed.
But "dual-mode" systems might just succeed where PRT seems doomed to fail. The Danish RUF system envisaged by Palle Jensen, for example, resembles PRT but with one key difference: vehicles have wheels as well as a slot allowing them to travel on a monorail, so they can drive off the rail onto a normal road. Once on a road, the occupant would take over from the computer, and the RUF vehicle—the term comes from a Danish saying meaning to "go fast"—would become an electric car.
Build a fast network of guideways in a busy city centre and people would have a strong incentive not just to use public RUF vehicles, but also to buy their own dual-mode vehicle. Commuters could drive onto the guideway, sit back and read as they are chauffeured into the city. At work, they would jump out, leaving their vehicles to park themselves. Unlike PRT, such a system could grow organically, as each network would serve a large area around it and people nearby could buy into it. And a dual-mode system might even win the support of car manufacturers, who could easily switch to producing dual-mode vehicles.
Of course, creating a new transport system will not be cheap or easy. But unlike adding a dedicated bus lane here or extending the underground railway there, an innovative system such as Jensen’s could transform cities.
And it’s not just a matter of saving a few minutes a day. According to the Red Cross, more than 30 million people have died in road accidents in the past century—three times the number killed in the First World War—and the annual death toll is rising. And what’s more, the Red Cross believes road accidents will become the third biggest cause of death and disability by 2020, ahead of diseases such as AIDS and tuberculosis. Surely we can find a better way to get around?
Questions 1-6
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this [br] The pollution caused by city transport has been largely ignored.
选项
A、真
B、假
C、Not Given
答案
B
解析
利用细节词“pollution”和顺序性原则定位于原文第二段第一句话“In recent years,the pollution belched out by millions of vehicles has dominated the debate about trans—port”。既然污染问题已经占据了人们对交通方式讨论的主要方面,那么就不可能“has been largely ignored"。题目信息与原文正好相反,所以答案为False。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3343886.html
相关试题推荐
Despiteitsmany(i)________,thewhole-languagephilosophyofteachingreading
Thereseemstobeno(i)_______thereadingpublic’sthirstforbooksaboutthe
Theaccusationswebringagainstothersshouldbe(i)______ourselves;theyshou
PART1Theexaminerwillaskyousomequestionsaboutyourself,suchas:—Whatco
PART1Theexaminerwillaskyousomequestionsaboutyourself,suchas:—Whatco
PART1Theexaminerwillaskyouquestionsaboutyourself,suchas:——What’syo
PART1Theexaminerwillaskyouquestionsaboutyourself,suchas:——What’syo
PART1Theexaminerwillaskyousomequestionsaboutyourself,suchas:—What
PART1Theexaminerwillaskyousomequestionsaboutyourself,suchas:—What
Discussiontopic:Films/MoviesExamplequestions:•Towhatextentdoyouthin
随机试题
Aspirinisoneofthesafestandmosteffectivedragsinventedbyman.Them
Myneighbor______herowndaughterasanexcellentsecretary!A、acquaintedB、intr
Youshouldnotfearspidersbecauseoftheirpoison.OfallthespidersinNorth
临边作业的防护栏杆应由横杆、立杆及高度不低于( )的挡脚板组成。A.150mm
3岁半小儿,脸色渐苍白3年,脾肋下4cm,Hb52g/L,WBC7.5×10
宫颈黏液检查见羊齿状结晶提示( )A.体内无雌、孕激素 B.体内有一定量的雌
对医术与医德之间关系的理解有误的是A."医乃仁术" B.有能力做的就应该去做
某机构投资者与某证券公司签订了证券交易委托代理协议,按照证券交易品种开立了股票交
根据《水利工程建设项目施工监理规范》,施工监理在工程资金控制方面的工作不包括(
建设工程项目管理规划是指导项目管理工作的纲领性文件。关于建设工程项目管理规划的编
最新回复
(
0
)