首页
登录
职称英语
Environmental Science[img]2014m9s/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_0501_20149[/img] [br] Wh
Environmental Science[img]2014m9s/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_0501_20149[/img] [br] Wh
游客
2024-01-03
20
管理
问题
Environmental Science
[br] What point does the professor make when he mentions that good topsoil takes thousands of years to form?
Environmental Science
Narrator
Listen to part of a lecture in an environmental science class.
Professor
OK, now let’s talk about another environmental concern—soil erosion. It’s a major problem, all around the world. Sometimes erosion damages soil so severely that the land can no longer be cultivated and it’s just abandoned. That happened in a big way right here in the United States. Some of you have probably read the novel The Grapes of Wrath. And maybe you remember that the story took place in the 1930s, during the time of what was called the Dust Bowl.
Dust Bowl is a term we use to describe an ecological and human disaster that took place in the southern Great Plains region. For nearly eight years, dust and sand blew across the area and covered everything. It was so bad it even made breathing and eating difficult. . . and farmers could only look on helplessly as their crops were destroyed and the land .. . and their lives ... ruined.
Now, there’d always been droughts and strong winds in that region. But that was OK because the native grasses had deep roots in the ground that were able to hold the soil in place. So the wind wasn’t able to, you know, erode the soil too badly. This changed, though, between 1900 and 1930. Agriculture was expanding rapidly then, and lots of farmers in the southern Great Plains wanted to grow wheat and other crops they could sell for cash—uh, crops that would be profitable. So they ripped up much of the grassland to plant these crops like wheat, which don’t hold the soil down nearly as well. At the same time, livestock—uh, cattle, too many of them—were feeding on grasses in the area and damaging a lot of the grassland. So these animals caused even more erosion of the soil.
It didn’t help that many of the actual owners of the land were not living anywhere near the area—a lot of the landowners lived way back east, and rented out the land to local people who lived on the land and worked on it, but, um, didn’t have much reason to take really good care of it. I mean, it wasn’t their land, right? The tenant farmers weren’t really interested in conserving someone else’s soil—not for the long term, anyway.
Also, some thought the land couldn’t really be damaged—you know, that the soil was so rich and deep that... it didn’t matter if the topsoil, the soil on the surface, blew away. They thought they could just plow up more. But they were wrong. Good top-soil takes a long time to form—it can literally take thousands of years to create good topsoil that will grow vegetation—and a very short time to ruin it. So after only a few years of excessive plowing, the land pretty much couldn’t be farmed anymore. And people moved on to other places and let the old areas just sit there. And when they didn’t plant anything on that land, that made it vulnerable to even more erosion. So it was kind of a vicious cycle, you could say.
Another problem, ironically, was that advances in technology were actually destroying the land, instead of improving it. A lot of farmers were using huge new tractors that dug deep into the ground and tore up a lot of the soil.
And then, of course, there was the weather. You know, when people look back on the Dust Bowl era, they tend to blame the drought—the lack of rain between 1934 and 1937. We can’t ignore the drought—I mean, it was the worst on record at the time and did help bring on this disaster. But—without the soil destruction—the drought alone wouldn’t have resulted in the devastation we call the Dust Bowl. It was poor farming techniques that made that happen.
Since then, though, we’ve paid more attention to trying to prevent a future Dust Bowl. One thing Congress did was enact a massive government effort to improve soil conservation, called the Soil Erosion Act. Under this law, large stretches of land in the southern Great Plains were identified as being at risk for erosion and were taken out of production and turned into permanent grassland. What that did—by protecting the land from excessive farming—was to stabilize the soil. Also, the Soil Erosion Act helped educate farmers to practice better soil conservation techniques, like reducing how often they plowed and using better equipment that would, you know, minimize damage to the soil structure.
选项
A、It takes a long time to ruin good topsoil.
B、It was wrong to believe that land could not be damaged.
C、Farmers should not have moved on to other places.
D、Plowing the land creates good topsoil faster than natural processes do.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3330038.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Letmewarnyouagainstamistakethathistoriansofscience
[originaltext]Letmewarnyouagainstamistakethathistoriansofscience
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
TheScienceofAnthropologyAThroughvariousmethodsof
TheScienceofAnthropologyAThroughvariousmethodsof
随机试题
Thepeoplewhomultitask(同时执行多项任务)themostaretheoneswhoareworstatit.
图示防水混凝土墙身施工缝的防水构造,下列说法错误的是哪一项?( ) A.B≥
-台理论排气量为0.1m3/s的半封闭式双螺杆压缩机,其压缩过程的指示效率为0.
属于配伍禁忌的是A.人参与大戟 B.人参与甘遂 C.人参与五倍子 D.人参
有性生殖生物进化的速度要快。原因是( )。A.繁殖速度快 B.产生的后代数量
简述影响课程实施的因素。
调节器官血流量的主要血管是A.毛细血管 B.微动脉 C.动-静脉吻合支 D
对上市公司进行收购的投资者持有的股份数量为100万股,持有的可转换为公司股票的非
某女性患者,26岁。缺失多年,余留牙均正常,咬合关系正常,缺隙龈距正常。该患者
下列各项中,符合我国税收立法规定的有( )。A.税收法律由国务院审议通过后以国
最新回复
(
0
)