首页
登录
职称英语
Environmental Science[img]2014m9s/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_0501_20149[/img] [br] Wh
Environmental Science[img]2014m9s/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_0501_20149[/img] [br] Wh
游客
2024-01-03
23
管理
问题
Environmental Science
[br] What does the professor mainly discuss?
Environmental Science
Narrator
Listen to part of a lecture in an environmental science class.
Professor
OK, now let’s talk about another environmental concern—soil erosion. It’s a major problem, all around the world. Sometimes erosion damages soil so severely that the land can no longer be cultivated and it’s just abandoned. That happened in a big way right here in the United States. Some of you have probably read the novel The Grapes of Wrath. And maybe you remember that the story took place in the 1930s, during the time of what was called the Dust Bowl.
Dust Bowl is a term we use to describe an ecological and human disaster that took place in the southern Great Plains region. For nearly eight years, dust and sand blew across the area and covered everything. It was so bad it even made breathing and eating difficult. . . and farmers could only look on helplessly as their crops were destroyed and the land .. . and their lives ... ruined.
Now, there’d always been droughts and strong winds in that region. But that was OK because the native grasses had deep roots in the ground that were able to hold the soil in place. So the wind wasn’t able to, you know, erode the soil too badly. This changed, though, between 1900 and 1930. Agriculture was expanding rapidly then, and lots of farmers in the southern Great Plains wanted to grow wheat and other crops they could sell for cash—uh, crops that would be profitable. So they ripped up much of the grassland to plant these crops like wheat, which don’t hold the soil down nearly as well. At the same time, livestock—uh, cattle, too many of them—were feeding on grasses in the area and damaging a lot of the grassland. So these animals caused even more erosion of the soil.
It didn’t help that many of the actual owners of the land were not living anywhere near the area—a lot of the landowners lived way back east, and rented out the land to local people who lived on the land and worked on it, but, um, didn’t have much reason to take really good care of it. I mean, it wasn’t their land, right? The tenant farmers weren’t really interested in conserving someone else’s soil—not for the long term, anyway.
Also, some thought the land couldn’t really be damaged—you know, that the soil was so rich and deep that... it didn’t matter if the topsoil, the soil on the surface, blew away. They thought they could just plow up more. But they were wrong. Good top-soil takes a long time to form—it can literally take thousands of years to create good topsoil that will grow vegetation—and a very short time to ruin it. So after only a few years of excessive plowing, the land pretty much couldn’t be farmed anymore. And people moved on to other places and let the old areas just sit there. And when they didn’t plant anything on that land, that made it vulnerable to even more erosion. So it was kind of a vicious cycle, you could say.
Another problem, ironically, was that advances in technology were actually destroying the land, instead of improving it. A lot of farmers were using huge new tractors that dug deep into the ground and tore up a lot of the soil.
And then, of course, there was the weather. You know, when people look back on the Dust Bowl era, they tend to blame the drought—the lack of rain between 1934 and 1937. We can’t ignore the drought—I mean, it was the worst on record at the time and did help bring on this disaster. But—without the soil destruction—the drought alone wouldn’t have resulted in the devastation we call the Dust Bowl. It was poor farming techniques that made that happen.
Since then, though, we’ve paid more attention to trying to prevent a future Dust Bowl. One thing Congress did was enact a massive government effort to improve soil conservation, called the Soil Erosion Act. Under this law, large stretches of land in the southern Great Plains were identified as being at risk for erosion and were taken out of production and turned into permanent grassland. What that did—by protecting the land from excessive farming—was to stabilize the soil. Also, the Soil Erosion Act helped educate farmers to practice better soil conservation techniques, like reducing how often they plowed and using better equipment that would, you know, minimize damage to the soil structure.
选项
A、A common weather pattern in the southern Great Plains region
B、Factors that created an ecological and human disaster
C、Farming techniques introduced during the Dust Bowl era
D、The erosion of grasslands by excessive rainfall
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3330036.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Letmewarnyouagainstamistakethathistoriansofscience
[originaltext]Letmewarnyouagainstamistakethathistoriansofscience
[originaltext]Letmewarnyouagainstamistakethathistoriansofscience
[originaltext]Letmewarnyouagainstamistakethathistoriansofscience
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
TheScienceofAnthropologyAThroughvariousmethodsof
TheScienceofAnthropologyAThroughvariousmethodsof
随机试题
WouldyouliketoorbittheEarthinsidetheInternationalSpaceStation?No
[img]2019m9x/ct_eyyjsbm_eyyjsbreada_0059_201909[/img]Thefirstthingpeople
下列有关特别提款权的说法错误的是()。A.它的价格根据主要发达国家货币汇率加权平
浆液性胸膜炎最常见的致病菌A.腺病毒 B.流感嗜血杆菌 C.金黄色葡萄球菌
关于稳压泵的流量和压力的确定,下列说法中错误的是()。A.消防给水系统稳压泵的
图示四个悬臂梁中挠曲线是圆弧的为:
国家的核心利益是( ) A.经济发展 B.人民幸福 C.维护国家主权和领
(2018年真题)下列关于内部控制措施的表述,错误的是()。A.合理确定各
夸美纽斯曾说过,教师的职责是用自己的榜样去教育学生。在言谈举止、为人之道等方面,
某工程项目建成投产后,正常生产年份的总成本费用为1000万元,其中期间费用150
最新回复
(
0
)