首页
登录
职称英语
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
游客
2024-01-03
27
管理
问题
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"
P1 The past century has seen heated controversy about whether intelligence, which relates strongly to school achievement, is determined primarily by heredity or by environment. A When
IQ
tests were undergoing rapid development early in the twentieth century, many psychologists believed that intelligence was determined primarily by heredity. B
P2 Environmentalist view. By the middle of the twentieth century, numerous studies had counteracted the hereditarian view, and most social scientists took the position that environment is as important as or even more important than heredity in determining intelligence. C Social scientists who stress the environmentalist view of intelligence generally emphasize the need for continual compensatory programs beginning in infancy. Many also criticize the use of IQ tests on the grounds that these tests are culturally biased. D
P3 James Flynn, who collected similar data on other countries, found that "massive" gains in the IQ scores of the population in fourteen nations have occurred during the twentieth century. These improvements, according to Flynn’s analysis, largely stemmed not from genetic improvement in the population but from environmental changes that ied to gains in the kinds of skills assessed by IQ tests. Torsten Husen and his colleagues also have concluded, after reviewing large amounts of data, that improvements in economic and social conditions, and particularly in the availability of schooling, can produce substantial gains in average IQ from one generation to the next. In general, educators committed to improving the performance of low-achieving students find these studies encouraging.
P4 Hereditarian view. The hereditarian view of intelligence underwent a major revival in the 1970s and 1980s, based particularly on the writings of Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and a group of researchers conducting the Minnesota Study of Twins. Summarizing previous research as well as their own studies, these researchers identified heredity as the major factor in determining intelligence—accounting for up to 80 percent of the variation in IQ scores.
P5 Jensen published a highly controversial study in the Harvard Educational Review in 1969. Pointing out that African-Americans averaged about 15 points below whites on IQ tests, Jensen attributed this gap to a genetic difference between the two races in learning abilities and patterns. Critics countered Jensen’s arguments by contending that a host of environmental factors that affect IQ, including malnutrition and prenatal care are difficult to measure and impossible to separate from hereditary factors. IQ tests are biased, they said, and do not necessarily even measure intelligence. After his 1969 article, Jensen has continued to cite data that he believed link intelligence primarily to heredity. His critics continue to respond with evidence that environmental factors, and schooling in particular, have a major influence on IQ.
P6 Synthesizers’ view. Certain social scientists have taken a middle, or "synthesizing," position in this controversy. The synthesizers’ view of intelligence holds that both heredity and environment contribute to differences in measured intelligence. For example, Christopher Jencks, after reviewing a large amount of data, concluded that heredity is responsible for 45 percent of the IQ variance, environment accounts for 35 percent, and interaction between the two ("interaction" meaning that particular abilities thrive or wither in specific environments) accounts for 20 percent. Robert Nichols reviewed all these and other data and concluded that the true value for heredity may be anywhere between 0.40 and 0.80 but that the exact value has little importance for policy. In general, Nichols and other synthesizers maintain that heredity determines the fixed limits of a range; within those limits, the interaction between environment and heredity yields the individual’s intelligence. In this view, even if interactions between heredity and environment limit our ability to specify exactly how much of a child’s intelligence reflects environmental factors, teachers (and parents) should provide each child with a productive environment in which to realize her or his maximum potential.
Glossary
IQ: intelligence quotient; a numerical value for intelligence [br] Why does the author mention the "Minnesota Study of Twins" in paragraph 4?
选项
A、To argue that environment is more important than heredity
B、To prove the importance of heredity in measuring IQ
C、To establish the synthesizer’s view of intelligence
D、To summarize previous research before designing a new study
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3329667.html
相关试题推荐
Itmaybearguedthatgenetics,the(study)ofheredityandvariation,(underwen
Thefoodandwaterthatpeople(consumethem)comefromtheenvironment,(provid
"EnvironmentalScienceClass"[img]2012q1/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_1047_20121[/img]
AScientificDebate:Neptunismvs.Plutonism1.Formodernge
AScientificDebate:Neptunismvs.Plutonism1.Formodernge
AScientificDebate:Neptunismvs.Plutonism1.Formodernge
AScientificDebate:Neptunismvs.Plutonism1.Formodernge
AScientificDebate:Neptunismvs.Plutonism1.Formodernge
AScientificDebate:Neptunismvs.Plutonism1.Formodernge
AScientificDebate:Neptunismvs.Plutonism1.Formodernge
随机试题
Beforeturningtowriting,Ispenteightyearsasalawyer______abouthowlife
Thesocietyisunstable,fullofcriminalcases,soyoucan’tbe______careful.A、
()的主要职责是帮助商品基金经理挑选商品交易顾问,并监控商品交易顾问的交易活动,控制风险。A、期货佣金商B、交易经理C、基金托管人D、基金投资者
Commonindoorplantsmayprovetobeavaluableweaponinthefightagainst
Ehrlish反应阳性的化合物为A.芦丁 B.去氧胆酸 C.葡萄糖 D.胆
血清甘油三酯临床意义
C第一步,本题考察非整数数列。 第二步,因后面的数字都有根号,因此考虑前面的整数也变为带根号的数字。观察到根号外面的数字有7和11,考虑构造质数数列。因此有,
某人做一道整数减法题时,把减数个位上的3看成了8,把减数十位上的8看成了3,得到
甲为庆祝好友乙66岁生日,拟赠与其古玉一枚。但双方约定,古玉交付乙后,甲可以
消化性溃疡X线诊断的可靠依据是A.局部激惹 B.局部压痛 C.局部变形 D
最新回复
(
0
)