[img]2018m9s/ct_etoefz_etoeflistz_201808_0012[/img] [br] What reason does the pr

游客2024-01-03  17

问题 [br] What reason does the professor give to support the claim that microhabitats lead to an increase in species diversity?
Listen to part of a lecture in a biology class.
Professor: One of the most noticeable differences between polar regions and tropical regions is the tropical ecosystems are much more diverse in terms of the plants and animals we find there. Now, remember that the farther you are from the equator, the more seasonal fluctuations in temperature there tend to be. So how do you think this affects animals in polar ecosystems in terms of food? Would you like to try to answer this question, John?
Student 1: I would guess that with big changes in seasons and you know, plants dying and animals migrating in the fall, it keeps changing what kinds of foods are available in polar regions.
Professor: Right and with that, the feeding behavior of polar animals. They tend to cover a lot of territory in search of food, and they need to be what we call, generalists, meaning that in their eating habits they’re amazingly flexible. A really good example is the Arctic Fox. It mainly eats smaller mammals.
Student 1: Like mice and rabbits?
Professor: Well yeah, that’s the idea, very small mammals of that sort, but in the summer its diet expands to include migratory birds and especially their eggs, as well as insects and even berries. It also feeds on seals or anything else that polar bears have killed and left behind, so the Arctic Fox’s definitely a generalist that’s pretty hard to categorize according to one particular type of food. Now, in the tropics, temperatures are much more stable, so what does that mean to animals in ecosystems there? Any ideas, Ann?
Student 2: Well, with temperatures about the same year round, their food sources would probably be much more stable too, so they wouldn’t have to keep adapting their feeding behavior to changing conditions.
Professor: Right, and typically these animals survive perfectly fine on just one or two food sources. They’ve become what we call specialists; living in one small part of the habitat, feeding on one particular kind of food. There’s a South American bird, for example, called the Yellow Eared Parrot that lives in Colombia, not far from the equator. It’s mostly green with patches of yellow feathers on the sides of its head near its ears. Anyway, this yellow-eared parrot nests in one particular species of palm tree: the wax palm, and it’s very picky about what it eats, mainly the fruit of the wax palm.
Student 2: But you said there’s more diversity in tropical ecosystems. I mean just because an animal prefers one special kind of food, why does that lead to more diversity?
Professor: Good question. What happens is that in the tropics with each species more or less specializing in a particular type of food, they’re more likely to divide up the ecological resources, so each little bit of the habitat essentially becomes a microhabitat that supports the species uniquely suited to thrive on the food and in the living space that this microhabitat provides. So in this kind of ecosystem, you end up with lots of microhabitats and lots of different species that are not competing with each other much at all. There’s a place for everyone.
Student 2: So the generalist species cover a lot of territory, but the specialists?
Professor: Unlike the generalists, they don’t need to.
Ok, now here’s a question to consider. Based on what we’ve been saying, in which kind of ecosystem, polar or tropical, would you expect species to have a better chance of survival?
Student 1: I guess that an animal species would have a better chance of surviving in the tropics.
Professor: Why do you think that?
Student 1: Well, if they each have their own little microhabitat with no competition for food or whatever, they don’t have to worry about much.
Professor: Right, that’s what you might think, except there is a downside to being a specialist. Can anyone think of what that might be?
Student 2: Well, like you said, they each have their own microhabitat. So what might happen if the microhabitat changes or disappears?
Professor: You’re on the right track!
Student 2: And if they can eat only one kind of food and that food grows in only one particular microhabitat, well, if that microhabitat disappears, they’re out of luck. They might all starve and the species could die out.
Professor: Right, extinction is a real threat. There are a lot of threatened species that are on the brink of extinction that live in tropical regions. They are mostly specialists whose microhabitat is being destroyed, often due to human activities. This was certainly true of the yellow-eared parrot, less so now that the wax palms are legally protected, but it’s definitely something to think about.

选项 A、They allow individual species to spread throughout multiple ecosystems.
B、They prevent animal species destroying their food sources through overpopulation.
C、They have temperatures that are suitable for many species.
D、They reduce competition among species for the same food resources.

答案 D

解析 细节题。线索词为教授所说:...you end up with lots of microhabitats and lots of different species that are not competing with each other much at all.教授提及microhabitats特点来解释物种多样性的原因。不同物种拥有各自不同的microhabitats,即各自的食物和栖息地。因为彼此之间不存在竞争关系,相处融洽,所以物种多样性增多。A选项与原文矛盾,文中提及各个物种无需奔波于多个生态系统,只需安稳地待在各自的“小环境”中。B选项中的overpopulation未在文中提及。C选项这句话单独来看是对的,但与题干构不成因果逻辑关系。温度适宜是食物来源稳定的原因,而不是引发物种多样性增加的原因。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3329051.html
最新回复(0)