What is the main purpose of the lecture? [br] What is the professor’s attitude t

游客2024-01-02  6

问题 What is the main purpose of the lecture? [br] What is the professor’s attitude toward the two theories?
Listen to part of a lecture in an astronomy class.
    Professor:
    Over the past decade we’ve discovered hundreds of celestial objects we call brown dwarfs. Actually they are more reddish than brown. Theories about them have been around for decades but it’s only recently that we’ve been able to find and observe them.
    Brown dwarfs are challenging for astronomers because they’re tough to classify. They have masses too large for a planet but too small for a star, and they share some characteristics with planets and others with stars. For example, they seem more like planets in that many of them orbit around stars, but they apparently form not like planets but in much the same way stars do at least initially.
    Remember stars originate in huge clouds of dust and gas thousands of light years across, or molecular clouds each with enough material to make dozens of stars. Young stars forming in the denser regions of molecular clouds known as cores, which eventually collapse due to their own gravity.
    Now within any given molecular cloud there can be several cores. And when they collapse, the inner portions break up into humps, which are stellar embryos, stars in the process of forming. So a collapsing core can contain several stellar embryos, several of which can become stars. The usual path to star formation is that the gravity of the stellar embryo pulls in material to add to its mass and at some point this embryo becomes so massive and dense that its material begins to fuse, to undergo nuclear fusion. Essentially it ignites and becomes a star that will burn for billions of years.
    Brown dwarfs start out like stars, we think, as stellar embryos collecting dust and gas in the cores of molecular clouds. And as they gather mass, they are heated by all the material rushing in and begin giving off some infrared light. Certain molecules may even undergo a particular kind of low level of fusion. But if a stellar embryo fails to pull in enough molecules of dust and gas, it will never grow massive enough to ignite the powerful, more typical sort of fusion that turns it into a full-fledged star.
    But what prevents that? Why does it just stop growing? So that after several million years, a fairly short time in astronomical terms, this failed star that we now call a brown dwarf just begins to cool again and fade. Two theories.
    First one is called the ejection theory. Okay, well, according to this ejection theory, the smaller stellar embryos inside a collapsing core, the embryos that haven’t competed so successfully for material to feed their growth, are more likely to get tossed around by or evenly ejected by gravitational forces, thrown right out of the core before they can collect enough material and become stars. So what might’ve become a star gets ejected and ends up nothing more than a brown dwarf. That’s the ejection theory.
    Then there’s the turbulence theory. The turbulence theory says that dust and gas are swirling around inside a molecular cloud and it’s this turbulence that compresses some area of the cloud into cores, but not every core has enough dust and gas to form into stars, so instead of stars some cores can only form brown dwarfs, because they never had enough material to form stars in the first place.
    Newborn stars are typically surrounded by disks of leftover dust and gas called disks. Over millions of years the disk material drains into the star and some of it may go into forming planets, asteroids or comets. Now if the turbulence theory is correct, brown dwarfs like many low mass stars should have stellar disks. But if ejection theory is correct, computer simulations have shown that any surrounding material will get snipped away mostly when the embryo is ejected from the core.
    So the brown dwarfs have stellar disks? It turns out that many do and the disks actually help us find brown dwarfs. See, like I said, brown dwarfs aren’t bright but do give off infrared radiation and the stellar disks reflect this infrared radiation and make it appear brighter. So astronomers look for that infrared access when they are searching for brown dwarfs. And hopefully as they observe the disks more closely, they’ll be able to get more clues about the formation of brown dwarfs. I mean we can’t say for sure that the ejection theory is incorrect. Maybe brown dwarfs form in different ways. Only if our space telescopes are able to catch them in the act of forming will we know for sure.

选项 A、He is convinced that neither of them can explain why brown dwarfs have stellar disks.
B、He hopes both theories will be confirmed by computer simulations.
C、He thinks evidence supports the turbulence theory even if he cannot rule out the ejection theory.
D、He finds the ejection theory more attractive than the turbulence theory.

答案 C

解析 题目询问教授对两种理论的态度。在讲座最后,教授介绍能证明紊流理沦的依据时,他说道,It turns out that many do“褐矮星存在星盘”、 the disks actually help us find brown dwarfs “这些星盘实际上能帮人们发现褐矮星”。由此不难推断,教授应该是支持这个理论的,但同时,他也提到we can’t say for sure that the ejection theory is incorrect “我们不能肯定地说抛射理沦就是错的”。所以综合来看,C项“他认为证据支持紊流理论,即使他不能排除抛射理论”更符合题意。这两种理论并不是用来解释为什么褐矮星有星盘的,可排除A项。B项“他希望两种理论能通过计算机模拟实验被证实”没有依据。从教授的表述可以发现,他更偏向于紊流理论,故D项“他发现抛射理论比紊流理论更有吸引力”与此相悖。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3327123.html
最新回复(0)