首页
登录
职称英语
Legislation, Lawsuits Cover Both Sides on Same-sex Marriage
Legislation, Lawsuits Cover Both Sides on Same-sex Marriage
游客
2024-01-01
16
管理
问题
Legislation, Lawsuits Cover Both Sides on Same-sex Marriage
法律,在同性婚姻问题上诉讼两边不得罪
In courtrooms and state capitols nationwide, opponents and supporters of gay marriage have embarked on a collision course, pursuing lawsuits and legislation so deeply at odds that prolonged legal chaos is likely.
One plausible result:a nation divided, at least briefly, between a handful of states recognizing gay marriage and a majority which do not.
The most clear-cut option for averting such chaos is a federal constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. However, despite support from President Bush, the amendment is given little chance of winning the needed two-thirds support in both the House and Senate this year.
Without it, experts say, the rival sides are likely to litigate so relentlessly that the US Supreme Court will eventually be compelled to intercede and clarify whether a legal same-sex union in one state must be recognized in other states.
"It’s going to be complicated for many years—we’re going to have some free-marriages states, and some that are not," said Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
"This is not a new situation in our country," Foreman addeD."We have had a hodgepodge of laws on different social issues. Invariably, we come to widespread consensus, and that’s going to happen to this issue. "
For now, though, consensus seems distant as two contrasting legal offensives take shape.
On one hand, courts in five relatively liberal states—California, New Jersey, New York, Oregon and Washington—are being asked to consider whether same-sex marriages should be alloweD.
In each of these states, local officials have recently performed gay marriages. Gay-rights supporters predict the supreme courts in at least a couple of the states will join Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court in authorizing such marriages.
Meanwhile, legislators in many states are moving to amend their constitutions to toughen existing bans on gay marriage and explicitly deny recognition to same-sex unions forged elsewhere.
Four states—Alaska, Hawaii, Nebraska and Nevada—already have such constitutional amendments. Similar measures are either certain or likely to go before voters in several other states in November or thereafter, including Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Utah and Wisconsin.
In 10 other legislatures, proposed constitutional amendments are pending—their fate not yet certain.
Matt Daniels, who as head of the Alliance for Marriage helped draft the proposed federal constitutional amendment, sees the developments in state,legislatures as proof of strong grass-roots opposition to gay marriage.
"As the courts push the envelope, public opinion moves in our direction," he said, "It’s a great national referendum...on whether we as a society are going to send a message through our laws that there’s something uniquely special about marriage between a man and a woman. "
However, Daniels is convinced that without an amendment putting that definition in the US Constitution, the courts will eventually strike down state down state laws banning gay marriage, as well as the federal Defense of Marriage Act. That measure, signed by President Clinton in 1996, allows states to refuse to honor same-sex unions performed elsewhere, and denies federal recognition to such unions.
Daniels said the proposed federal amendment, if it did clear Congress, would easily win the required ratification by at least 38 state legislatures.
He acknowledged that the measure may have difficulty getting two-thirds backing in the current Senate, where few Democrats support it. But he predicted that pressure on politicians to approve the amendment will increase, once gay couples married in Massachusetts or elsewhere successfully sue to have their marriage honored in other states.
"When the lawsuits start to export what happens in Massachusetts, you will have a political powder keg for politicians who refuse to pay heed to public opinion," Daniels saiD."This will change the political landscape. "
William Reppy, a Duke University law professor, agreed that a challenge to the non- recognition of gay marriages across state lines will be critical—perhaps what ultimately decides the issue.
"There will be a split of authority—one state court will say it’s valid, another will say it isn’t," Reppy predicteD."Then the US Supreme Court would have their hand forced, and hear the case. They don’t let splits of authority run rampant around the country for very long. " [br] Which of the following statement is true of Matt Daniels?
选项
A、He is one of the drafters of the constitutional amendment to support intersexual marriage.
B、He is optimistic about a legal ban on gay marriage.
C、He thinks that intersexual marriage is a unique constitutional proposition.
D、He believes that eventually the states will gain the upper hand in approving of gay marriage.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3324148.html
相关试题推荐
Rolechanges,suchasAmarriage,thebirthofachild,Bandachangeinjob,Cca
Legislation,LawsuitsCoverBothSidesonSame-sexMarriage
Legislation,LawsuitsCoverBothSidesonSame-sexMarriage
Legislation,LawsuitsCoverBothSidesonSame-sexMarriage
CustomsofBulgaria:MarriageandFamily保加利亚习俗:婚姻与家庭Theaverageage
CustomsofBulgaria:MarriageandFamily保加利亚习俗:婚姻与家庭Theaverageage
CustomsofBulgaria:MarriageandFamily保加利亚习俗:婚姻与家庭Theaverageage
CustomsofBulgaria:MarriageandFamily保加利亚习俗:婚姻与家庭Theaverageage
CustomsofBulgaria:MarriageandFamily保加利亚习俗:婚姻与家庭Theaverageage
CustomsofBulgaria:MarriageandFamily保加利亚习俗:婚姻与家庭Theaverageage
随机试题
中国某大豆进口商,在5月份即将从美国进口大豆,为了防止价格上涨,2月10日该进口商在CBOT买入40手敲定价格为660美分/蒲式耳的5月大豆的看涨期权,权利金为
下列对有机建筑的解释,哪一条不是美国著名建筑大师赖特的论述:()A.有机建筑
及时反馈是促使传播进行下去的A.突出条件 B.显著要素 C.重要条件 D.
细集料筛分试验应进行二次平行试验,以平均值为测定值。若二次试验所得的细度模数之差
患者,女性,54岁,于家中搬家具时突然出现腰部剧烈疼痛,且双下肢有放射样麻木及疼
简述云盘的概念及特点。
法国作曲家奥涅格的管弦乐曲《太平洋231》描绘的音乐形象是() A.大
箱涵顶进挖运土方,两侧应欠挖( )mm,钢刃脚切土顶进。 A、80 B、
在压片过程中,常出现裂片、松片或崩解迟缓等各种原因。下列哪些是造成裂片的原因
确诊肺结核的主要依据是( )。A.X线检查 B.痰中找到结核分枝杆菌 C.
最新回复
(
0
)