首页
登录
职称英语
This Coronavirus affects everyone, but not equally. The young often shrug of
This Coronavirus affects everyone, but not equally. The young often shrug of
游客
2023-12-30
20
管理
问题
This Coronavirus affects everyone, but not equally. The young often shrug off the virus; the old often die of it. The rich shrug off the economic shock; the poor cannot. Because of COVID-19, the number of extremely poor people (i.e., those making less than $1.90 a day) will rise by 70m-100m this year, the World Bank predicts. Using a broader measure, including those who lack basic shelter or clean water and children who go hungry, the ranks of the poor will swell by 240m^90m this year, says the UN. That could reverse almost a decade of progress (see International section). If a vaccine is found, economies will no doubt bounce back. But widespread vaccination will take years and the very poor cannot wait that long. By then, malnutrition will have affected a tragic number of children’s bodies and minds.
Safety-nets in low-income countries are
cobweb-thin
. Governments there have handed out only $4 extra per person on social programs—in total, not per day.
Donors should help. Rich countries are on course to cut direct aid by a third compared with last year. The IMF and World Bank have raised lending, but only 31% more of the bank’s money has reached poor countries, says the Center for Global Development, a think-tank, about half the increase in the global financial crisis, a much smaller shock.
Governments in some countries, meanwhile, need to spend their money wisely. Too many offer pork for old rich friends but only crumbs for the poor. Since the crisis began, one country has provided no new programs for the hard-up but has given a state oil giant tax breaks worth $2.7bn. Another country is expected soon to confirm another wasteful effort to keep its money-losing airline aloft. Even when money is earmarked for good ends, it is too often wasted or stolen. The country’s investigators are probing possible fraud in 658 contracts worth $300m for COVID-fighting kit (测试纸) Still another country’s health ministry bought some masks for $53 each. In a leaked recording, a laughter allegedly belonging to an official burst out as she and her colleagues appear to plan to pocket money meant for reducing suffering in the pandemic.
The best way to help the poor is to give them money directly. The simplicity of this policy makes it less vulnerable to corruption. With a little extra cash in their pockets, recipients can feed their children and send them back to school. They can avoid a fire-sale of assets, such as a motorbike or a cow, that will help them make a living in the future. One country that has done well getting cash into poor pockets is Brazil. Various measures of poverty there have actually fallen, largely because the government has sent $110 per month for three months to the impoverished, helping 66m people. A priority for governments should be basic health care, which the pandemic has disrupted so badly that vaccination rates for children have been set back about 20 years.
The crisis requires politicians to make hard choices quickly. Mistakes are inevitable, given how much remains unknown about the disease. But some are inexcusable. One country’s sudden lockdown threw millions of migrant workers out of their urban jobs and lodgings, forcing them to head back to their villages on foot or crowded trains, spreading the virus far and wide. Another country barred people from leaving home at night but then removed from shacks (棚屋) on public land, tens of thousands who are living in a building or on land without permission or without paying rent with no place to go. Politicians governing remotely from their comfortable home offices should think harder about how their decisions might affect those whom COVID-19 is plunging back into dire poverty. It is shameful when their responses to the pandemic add to the suffering of the least fortunate. [br] In Paragraph 4, by "Too many offer pork for old rich friends but only crumbs for the poor", the author intends to_________.
选项
A、emphasize the imbalance between the rich and the poor
B、praise the governments for their wise practice in addressing the problem
C、blame the government for their injustice in distributing the money to its citizens
D、indicate that the poor people are in much urgent need of food than the rich
答案
C
解析
句意:太多国家的政府给老富豪朋友提供猪肉,却只给穷人提供面包屑。也就是说这些国家的政府在分配资金时“嫌贫爱富”。而作者认为这是不公正的,所以选项C为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3319611.html
相关试题推荐
每个人都有各自的长处与缺点,应该互相学习,才能取人之长,补己之短。Everyonehashisownstrongpointsaswellash
EveryoneinNawabColonycanpointtovictims.Twenty-year-oldAnnisa,forin
Alldon’thaveafreeticketmustpaytheadmissionfee.A、Everyonewhodoesn’th
Insuranceisthesharingof【C1】______.Nearlyeveryoneisexposed【C2】______r
Insuranceisthesharingof【C1】______.Nearlyeveryoneisexposed【C2】______r
Insuranceisthesharingof【C1】______.Nearlyeveryoneisexposed【C2】______r
Insuranceisthesharingof【C1】______.Nearlyeveryoneisexposed【C2】______r
Insuranceisthesharingof【C1】______.Nearlyeveryoneisexposed【C2】______r
Insuranceisthesharingof【C1】______.Nearlyeveryoneisexposed【C2】______r
Insuranceisthesharingof【C1】______.Nearlyeveryoneisexposed【C2】______r
随机试题
Itisimportantthatyourhomework(do)______byyourself,otherwise,youwouldn
[originaltext]Minimumwageisthelowesthourlypayratepermittedbylaw.[
企业对非常规的、无法预估结果发生概率的业务活动进行经营决策时,采用的决策方法是(
合理应用血管活性药物是抗休克的重要措施,下列注意事项中,错误的是A.在补充血容量
简述教育的生物起源论和心理起源论的共同缺陷。
12、16、22、30、39、49、() A.61B.62C.64D
不宜口服甲硝唑治疗滴虫阴道炎的时期是A:哺乳期 B:老年期 C:性成熟期
A股、基金、债券、ETF、权证等品种最终交收时点为()。 A.T日15
私募股权基金中GP是指()。A.基金管理人 B.基金投资人
根据法的空间效力规则,发生在下列地点中的案件,应当适用我国法律的是()。A.停
最新回复
(
0
)