首页
登录
职称英语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal
游客
2023-12-29
25
管理
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states. [br]
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
veto
解析
动词。本题考查动词搭配。veto可与proposal搭配,该动词意思为“否决”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3316881.html
相关试题推荐
渔业大约有4万人,平均每年的捕获量为100万吨,每年英国人平均食鱼量约为美国人的四倍。About40,000peopleworkinthefishi
SomepeopleaccusemeofbeingrudebecauseIalwaysintroducemyselftootherp
I’veknownseveralpeoplewhohaveovercomenail-bitingsimplybybuying50nail
Peoplerememberemotionallychargedeventsmoreeasilythantheyrecallthe
国民健康水平进一步提高,人均预期寿命达到75岁。People’s(Thepeople’s)healthfurtherimproved,andthe
Therearealsopeoplewhoobjecttofairytalesonthegroundsthattheyarenot
Asforthepeoplewhoseeyesstillfindthegreatreasonsbehindthetechnology
OldpeopleinThiengolysaytheycanrememberwhenthereweresomanytreest
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenarecon
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenarecon
随机试题
DearMr.Suzuki,ThegoodswereceivedonJuly15werefoundnottomatchou
Undernocircumstances____________________(他会反对)herproposalthattheytakea
[originaltext]Goodmorning,folks.Welcometo"TheElephantWalk".Todayw
InafewweeksresearcherswillbeginscouringtheFloridaseafloorfora17
阅读,才足以体会文章的音韵之美,文字之_______,情感之切,意蕴之____
WhatdidDaviddointhesummerof2003?
(2016年真题)关于公共物品的说法,正确的有()。A.公共物品的市场需求
甲商业银行为增值税一般纳税人,2020年第二季度经营情况如下: (1)提供贷款
政府采购要按照事先约定的条件和程序进行,对所有供应商一视同仁,任何单位和个人无权
下列关于内心信念的提法中,错误的是A.它是医学道德的评价方式之一 B.它是医务
最新回复
(
0
)