首页
登录
职称英语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned ag
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned ag
游客
2023-12-26
32
管理
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and ... find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals.
Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry — making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature —
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows — as if we needed reminding — that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense. [br] The author believes that______.
选项
A、Denmark’s experience can be generalized
B、measures should be taken to reduce bacteria
C、antibiotics protection is essential to animals
D、limiting the use of antibiotics has technical proof
答案
A
解析
观点题。第5段第6句“丹麦的例子就证明了在农场减少抗生素的使用不会引发金融灾难。”因此选择答案A(丹麦的经验可以普及)。注意考生易误选D,其实是对第5段第5句的误读,该句说到的“技术问题可以解决”是说我们可以找到对抗耐药细菌的办法,容易让人想当然地认为抗生素的限用有技术支撑。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3306125.html
相关试题推荐
Duringthe19thcentury,JewsinmostEuropeancountriesachievedsomeequality
Europeanconservatives,untiltheendofthe19thcentury,rejecteddemocraticp
Doctorswarnedsun-starvedtouristswhoreceivedtoomuchsunlightthattheywer
Forthousandsofyears,tuberculosisravagedEuropeancities.Todayanepidemic
Formorethan50years,microbiologistsintheU.S.andEuropehavewarnedag
Formorethan50years,microbiologistsintheU.S.andEuropehavewarnedag
Formorethan50years,microbiologistsintheU.S.andEuropehavewarnedag
Formorethan50years,microbiologistsintheU.S.andEuropehavewarnedag
Formorethan50years,microbiologistsintheU.S.andEuropehavewarnedag
Foreveryone’ssake,whichmattersthatEuropeansgaugetheirwelcometoChinaw
随机试题
EveryObjectTellsaStory凡事皆有戏Everyonehasaparticularo
Severalpeopleinthecrowdseemedtobe(fight)______.fighting
[originaltext]Therewasonceamanwhospentallhistimeinhisglasshouse
WhenIaminaserioushumor,IveryoftenwalkbymyselfinWestminsterAbb
[originaltext]M:Goodmorning,madam.IsthereanythingIcandoforyou?W:I
在教学过程中让学生对自己的学习状况进行自我评估,或者凭教师的平常观察记录或与学生
2019年年底某会计师事务所与政府机关因各自办公所需共同购得一栋办公楼,占地面积
未经履行出资人职责的机构同意,国有独资公司的董事不得在其他企业兼职。()
屋面高聚物改性沥青防水卷材的常用铺贴方法有()。A.热熔法 B.热粘接剂
A.从事医师执业活动 B.中止医师执业活动 C.申请执业医师注册 D.不予
最新回复
(
0
)