首页
登录
职称英语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
游客
2023-12-26
30
管理
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists — or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions — in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion — a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also sort the scientific sheep from the goats, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.
A revolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be. [br] The first two paragraphs intend to indicate that______.
选项
A、taxpayers should make great efforts to exchange ideas
B、publishers are regarded as a negative factor in science
C、the government is liable to pay for research expenses
D、the results of research projects are freely available to the public
答案
B
解析
推断题。前两段的核心内容是“纳税人希望免费获得由财政支持的科技成果信息,而期刊出版商却成了其羁绊”。近来,英国政府推出一项举措,由财政资助的科研成果在网上免费向公众开放。将本题的四个选项与这些内容比对后,可知B为正确答案。A未提及,C和D的共同问题是未限定财政支持。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3305996.html
相关试题推荐
Peopleshouldbereadytosavethemselvesinsteadofcountingsolelyonthegove
Workforceisdefinedasthetotalnumberofpeoplewhoareavailabletowork
Theretheycome,trudgingalong,straightuprightonstubbylegs,shoulders
Exactlywhyobesityandearlydevelopmentshouldbelinkedisnotwellunderstoo
二十国集团应该在促进全球贸易增长方面发挥更大作用,继续反对保护主义,加强多边贸易体制,促进全球价值链深化发展。TheG20shouldplayabig
Openlyavailablehigh-qualitycontentonthewebcanalsoimproveaccesstoknow
我们的教育应该让受教育者认识到,各行各业都是社会所必需的,以自己的工作为耻或藐视他人的工作,都是极其错误的。Oureducationshouldlett
以民主、包容、合作、共赢的精神实现共同安全,做到一国内部的事情一国自主办、大家共同的事情大家商量办。Weshouldworkforcommonsecu
Weshouldletmoreyoungparentsandtheirchildrencanenjoyscientificearlye
Lifeinsurance,beforeavailableonlytoyoung,healthypersons,cannowbeobta
随机试题
Abouttwo-thirdsoftheworld’spopulationisexpectedtoliveincitiesby
WhichofthefollowingsentencesindicatesCOMMAND?A、Youmusthavetoldherthe
[originaltext]Hi.Welcome.TodayI’mgoingtotalkabouthowchildrenlearn
Herewehaveaninevitabledistinction.Theremustbeworkdonebythearms,
A. B. C.
治疗血瘀气滞,经行腹痛,兼风湿肩臂疼痛者,应选用A.桃仁 B.丹参 C.
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
患者,男性,51岁。在输液过程中突然感到胸部不适,随后出现呼吸困难,严重发绀,伴
关于劳务派遣的内容,下列描述错误的是()A:指劳务派遣单位与接受单位签订劳务
对于Ⅱ类工业固体废物贮存、处置场,如果天然基础层渗透系数大于( )cm/s时,
最新回复
(
0
)