首页
登录
职称英语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplo
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplo
游客
2023-12-26
27
管理
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power" — i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America — it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru — most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America — think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales — it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade — partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority — this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an
entreguista
and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area — increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sectpr — a sector of tremendous strategic importance — the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers. [br] The word "entreguista" underlined in Paragraph 5 most probably means______.
选项
A、criminal
B、traitor
C、corruptionist
D、villain
答案
B
解析
语义题。criminal罪犯,traitor叛国者,corruptionist贪官,villain恶棍。根据上下文,entreguista意为“叛国者”,故正确答案为B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3305774.html
相关试题推荐
Hisinabilitytolearnforeignlanguageswasa(n)obstacletohiscareer.A、barrie
AlthoughthisbookclaimstobeabiographyofGeorgeWashington,manyofthein
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Someobserverssaytherecentcoupofamilitarygovernmentinthatcountrywill
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Someobserverssaytherecentcoupofamilitarygovernmentinthatcountrywill
Thorndikereachedthesummitofhiscareerin1934,whenhewaselectedpresiden
Whilethedelegateclearlysoughttodampentheoptimismthathasemergedrecent
Mostreadersaredrawntothefacetiousstoriesofhisrecentnovel.A、factualB、
AccordingtotherecentresearchofNortheasternUniversity,our______sensitiv
随机试题
Byeducation,Imeantheinfluenceoftheenvironmentupontheindividualto
SincetheTitanicvanishedbeneaththefrigidwatersoftheNorthAtlantic85
A. B. C. D.
钢筋的强屈比应不小于()。A.1.05 B.1 C.1.5 D.1.
人们常用能量金字塔来说明生态系统中哪两者之间的关系( )。A.能量与营养级 B
患者,男,28岁。近1个月以来,口腔溃疡反复发作,心烦,夜晚难以入睡,小便黄,舌
按照审计的组织方式,可以将审计划分为()。A.就地审计 B.报送审计
从严治警,就是指对公安民警严格教育、严格训练、严格管理、严格处罚,其核心是“严”
有效的内部控制应为证券公司实现下述()目标提供合理保证。 A.保证经营的合法
(2013年真题)根据民法理论,下列有关民事法律关系的说法中,正确的是()。A
最新回复
(
0
)